Personhood, harm and interest: a reply to Alberto Giubilini and Francesca Minerva

Journal of Medical Ethics 39 (5):1-4 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX


In the article ‘After-birth abortion: why should the baby live?’ arguments are made in favour of the moral permissibility of intentionally killing newborn infants, under particular conditions. Here we argue that their arguments are based on an indefensible view of personhood, and we question the logic of harm and interest that informs their arguments. Furthermore, we argue that the conclusions here are so contrary to ordinary moral intuitions that the argument and conclusions based upon it—including those which defend more mainstream methods of abortion—should be treated with immediate suspicion



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,075

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Potentials and burdens: a reply to Giubilini and Minerva.Francis J. Beckwith - 2013 - Journal of Medical Ethics 39 (5):341-344.
Capacity, harm and experience in the life of persons as equals.John Finnis - 2013 - Journal of Medical Ethics 39 (5):281-283.
The moral status of babies.Andrew McGee - 2013 - Journal of Medical Ethics 39 (5):345-348.
After-birth abortion: why should the baby live?Alberto Giubilini & Francesca Minerva - 2013 - Journal of Medical Ethics 39 (5):261-263.
Reasons and Freedom.Alberto Giubilini & Francesca Minerva - 2013 - Hastings Center Report 43 (1):4-5.
Killing fetuses and killing newborns.Ezio Di Nucci - 2013 - Journal of Medical Ethics 39 (5):19-20.
Stem cell research, personhood and sentience.Lisa Bortolotti & John Harris - 2005 - Reproductive Biomedicine Online 10:68-75.


Added to PP

47 (#339,161)

6 months
7 (#433,721)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Sandra Lynch
University of Notre Dame Australia

Citations of this work

Rethinking academic freedom.Francesca Minerva - 2015 - Ethics in Science and Environmental Politics 15 (1):95-104.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references