Social Philosophy and Policy 17 (2):276 (2000)
Western ethics and law have been slow to come to conclusions about the right to choose the time and manner of one's death. However, policies, practices, and legal precedents have evolved quickly in the last quarter of the twentieth century, from the forgoing of respirators to the use of Do Not Resuscitate orders, to the forgoing of all medical technologies, and now, in one U.S. state, to legalized physician-assisted suicide. The sweep of history—from the Quinlan case in New Jersey to legislation in Oregon that allows physician-assisted suicide—has been as rapid as it has been revolutionary
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Euthanasia and Physicians' Moral Duties.Gary Seay - 2005 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 30 (5):517 – 533.
Similar books and articles
Privacy and Autonomy: From Warren and Brandeis to Roe and Cruzan.Thomas Halper - 1996 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 21 (2):121-135.
Egalitarian Justice Versus the Right to Privacy?Richard Arneson - 2000 - Social Philosophy and Policy 17 (2):91.
Biobank Research and the Right to Privacy.Lars Øystein Ursin - 2008 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 29 (4):267-285.
Four Challenges for a Theory of Informational Privacy.Luciano Floridi - 2006 - Ethics and Information Technology 8 (3):109-119.
Values Education and the Right to Privacy.Alan L. Lockwood - 1977 - Journal of Moral Education 7 (1):9-26.
Privacy by Design: Delivering the Promises. [REVIEW]Peter Hustinx - 2010 - Identity in the Information Society 3 (2):253-255.
Added to index2010-08-31
Total downloads29 ( #177,582 of 2,171,800 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #326,702 of 2,171,800 )
How can I increase my downloads?