Between Relativism and Imperialism: Navigating Moral Diversity in Cross‐Cultural Bioethics

Developing World Bioethics 15 (3):162-171 (2015)
Daniel Beck
Michigan State University
The need for explicit theoretical reflection on cross-cultural bioethics continues to grow as the spread of communication technologies and increased human migration has made interactions between medical professionals and patients from different cultural backgrounds much more common. I claim that this need presents us with the following dilemma. On the one hand, we do not want to operate according to an imperialist ethical framework that denies and silences the legitimacy of cultural values other than our own. On the other hand, we do not want to backslide into a form of cultural relativism that is unable to critically appraise cultural practices that are harmful, unjust, or oppressive. I examine two prominent attempts – the principlism of Tom Beauchamp and James Childress and the Contractarianism of Robert Baker – to frame cross-cultural bioethics between these two extremes and argue that both approaches have significant flaws. The principlist approach fails to provide a non-question begging way to identify cross-cultural norms that does not already assume the universal legitimacy of moral principles dominant in North American society. Baker's contractarianism cannot grapple with the realities of political power imbalances that often characterize cross-cultural moral disputes. I suggest that a naturalized feminist framework, though not free of its own theoretical difficulties, provides the best alternative for approaching moral diversity respectfully and critically
Keywords Culture  moral relativism  naturalized ethics  Bioethics  moral universalism  developing world bioethics
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/dewb.12059
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 37,965
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Principles of Biomedical Ethics.Tom L. Beauchamp - 1979 - Oxford University Press.
The Language of Morals.R. M. Hare - 1952 - Oxford Clarendon Press.

View all 18 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Biopolitics, Pseudoscience, and Bioethics in the Global South.Kiarash Aramesh - 2017 - American Journal of Bioethics 17 (10):26-28.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

A Moral Framework for Multicultural Education in Healthcare.Wayne Vaught - 2003 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 24 (4):301-328.
Defence of Cultural Relativism.Seungbae Park - 2011 - Cultura 8 (1):159-170.
Cultural Relativism and the Theory of Relativity.Seungbae Park - 2014 - Filosofija. Sociologija 25 (1):44-51.
Relativism and Ethical Competence.Jaromír Feber & Jelena Petrucijová - 2013 - Ethics and Bioethics (in Central Europe) 3 (1-2):73-86.
Medizin Und Moral Ohne Kontext.Walter Bruchhausen - 2001 - Ethik in der Medizin 13 (3):176-192.
Towards a Meta Ethics of Culture – Halfway to a Theory of Metanorms.M. Karmasin - 2002 - Journal of Business Ethics 39 (4):337 - 346.


Added to PP index

Total views
29 ( #231,176 of 2,312,279 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #300,275 of 2,312,279 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature