Discussion of Susanna Siegel's “Can perceptual experiences be rational?”

Analytic Philosophy 59 (1):175-190 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Other Versions

original Siegel, Susanna (2018) "Replies to Beck, Chirimuuta, Rosenhagen, Smithies, and Springle". Analytic Philosophy 59(1):175-190

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 97,197

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-03-26

Downloads
147 (#135,571)

6 months
22 (#172,085)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

T. Raja Rosenhagen
California State University, Fresno
Ori Beck
Ben-Gurion University of the Negev
Declan Smithies
Ohio State University
3 more

Citations of this work

Replies to Brewer, Gupta, and McDowell.Susanna Siegel - 2019 - Philosophical Issues 29 (1):403-410.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No Exception for Belief.Susanna Rinard - 2017 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 94 (1):121-143.
Very Improbable Knowing.Timothy Williamson - 2014 - Erkenntnis 79 (5):971-999.
The Rationality of Perception : Replies to Lord, Railton, and Pautz.Susanna Siegel - 2020 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 101 (3):764-771.
Delusions as 'wrong beliefs': A conceptual history.German E. Berrios - 1991 - British Journal of Psychiatry 159 (S14):6-13.
Delusion, Rationality, Empathy: Commentary on Martin Davies et al.Gregory Currie & Jon Jureidini - 2001 - Philosophy, Psychiatry, and Psychology 8 (2):159-162.

View all 7 references / Add more references