Plato's Self-Corrective Development of the Concepts of Soul, Forms and Immortality in Three Arguments of the "Phaedo"
Dissertation, Bryn Mawr College (1993)
Abstract |
Scholars agree that the proofs for immortality of the soul in Plato's Phaedo are unconvincing. Many scholars think Plato was unaware of any errors. I argue both that the proofs are ultimately unconvincing and that Plato was aware of the flaws. I argue that the overall purpose of the Phaedo is to present a number of possible arguments for the soul's immortality in a philosophically systematic way. ;Only three of the arguments for immortality in the Phaedo include a discussion of the forms: the argument from recollection of the forms at 73a-77a; the argument from a dualistic split between forms and sensibles at 78b-84b; and the argument from forms as causes of the existence and nature of sensibles at 96a-107c. First, I argue that the view of forms, soul and immortality in each argument is internally consistent. Next, each of the three arguments contains three significantly different views of forms, soul and immortality. Finally, the arguments are related to each other in a philosophically significant way. When the reader examines the definitions, assumptions and inferences in the argument from recollection, it is possible to draw conclusions about the most important weaknesses in the argument. The next argument, the argument from dualism, begins with a new set of definitions, assumptions and inferences which avoid the flaws of the previous view. However, it also contains serious flaws. The third argument, in turn, begins with assumptions and definitions which avoid the problems of the argument from dualism. Each of the arguments is a further development, or refinement, of the previous view, rather than a radical rejection of it. Even the last argument in the Phaedo, however is inadequate. The Phaedo, therefore, is a truly dialectical philosophical conversation about the immortality of the soul. The views of soul and forms in the Republic are, in turn, more refined than any in the Phaedo, leading the reader to reconsider and reformulate the question of immortality
|
Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Plato's Self-Corrective Development of the Concepts of Soul, Forms, and Immortality in Three Arguments of the Phaedo.Martha C. Beck - 1999 - E. Mellen Press.
Plato's Affinity Argument for the Immortality of the Soul.David Apolloni - 1996 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 34 (1):5-32.
Soul and Intermediates in Plato's "Phaedo".Eunshil Bae - 1996 - Dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles
Immortality of the Soul in the Platonic Dialogues and Aristotle.Patrick Duncan - 1942 - Philosophy 17 (68):304 - 323.
Unity and Development in Plato's Psychology.Ellen Margaret Wagner - 1995 - Dissertation, University of Colorado at Boulder
An Ambivalence in Plato's Theory of Forms.John Frederick Pepple - 1984 - Dissertation, University of Minnesota
Soul, World, and Idea: An Interpretation of Plato's "Republic" and "Phaedo".Daniel Sherman - 2013 - Lexington Books.
Two Concepts of the Soul in Plato's Phaedo: A Beginner's Guide to the Phaedo and Some Related Platonic Texts on the Immortality of the Soul.Ryan Topping - 2007 - Upa.
A Metaphor in Plato: 'Running Away' and 'Staying Behind' in the Phaedo and the Timaeus.D. O'Brien - 1977 - Classical Quarterly 27 (02):297-.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2015-02-04
Total views
0
Recent downloads (6 months)
0
2015-02-04
Total views
0
Recent downloads (6 months)
0
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.