Reconsidering the role of overcoming perturbations in cognitive development: constructivism and consicousness

Human Development 47 (2):77-93 (2004)
Abstract
Constructivist theory must choose between the hypothesis that felt perturbation drives cognitive development (the priority of felt perturbation) and the hypothesis that the particular process that eventually produces new cognitive structures first produces felt perturbation (the continuity of process). There is ambivalence in Piagetian theory regarding this choice. The prevalent account of constructivist theory adopts the priority of felt perturbation. However, on occasion Piaget has explicitly rejected it, simultaneously endorsing the continuity of process. First, I explicate and support this latter position, arguing that felt perturbation emerges after the construction of a new cognitive structure has already begun. Next, I discuss the broader significance of rejecting the priority of felt perturbation in terms of a distinction between two types of theory of effective change, labeled Lamarckian and Darwinian in analogy with familiar theories of evolutionary change. Rejecting the priority of felt perturbation allows the development of a Darwinian perspective. In turn, the Darwinian perspective offers advantages for elaborating the analogy Piaget proposed between consciousness and the relation of form and content.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Translate to english
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 27,220
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
A Connecticut Yalie in King Descartes' Court.Eric Dietrich & Valerie Gray Hardcastle - 2002 - Newsletter of Cognitive Science Society (Now Defunct).
Explanations at Multiple Levels.Alexander Rueger - 2001 - Minds and Machines 11 (4):503-520.
Student-Centred Philosophy.Venera-Mihaela Cojocariu - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 37:35-41.
Neural Constructivism or Self-Organization?Peter C. M. Molenaar & Han L. J. van der Maas - 2000 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (5):783-784.
Hume's Changing Views on the 'Durability' of Scepticism.Brian Ribeiro - 2009 - Journal of Scottish Philosophy 7 (2):215-236.
Hegel and Epistemological Constructivism.Tom Rockmore - 2006 - Idealistic Studies 36 (3):183-190.
Deconstructing Neural Constructivism.Olaf Sporns - 1997 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 20 (4):576-577.
Neoconstructivism: A Unifying Constraint for the Cognitive Sciences.Stevan Harnad - 1982 - In Thomas W. Simon & Robert J. Scholes (eds.), [Book Chapter]. Lawrence Erlbaum. pp. 1-11.

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2010-11-01

Total downloads

34 ( #150,458 of 2,164,828 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

2 ( #188,443 of 2,164,828 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums