Reconsidering the role of overcoming perturbations in cognitive development: constructivism and consicousness
Human Development 47 (2):77-93 (2004)
Constructivist theory must choose between the hypothesis that felt perturbation drives cognitive development (the priority of felt perturbation) and the hypothesis that the particular process that eventually produces new cognitive structures first produces felt perturbation (the continuity of process). There is ambivalence in Piagetian theory regarding this choice. The prevalent account of constructivist theory adopts the priority of felt perturbation. However, on occasion Piaget has explicitly rejected it, simultaneously endorsing the continuity of process. First, I explicate and support this latter position, arguing that felt perturbation emerges after the construction of a new cognitive structure has already begun. Next, I discuss the broader significance of rejecting the priority of felt perturbation in terms of a distinction between two types of theory of effective change, labeled Lamarckian and Darwinian in analogy with familiar theories of evolutionary change. Rejecting the priority of felt perturbation allows the development of a Darwinian perspective. In turn, the Darwinian perspective offers advantages for elaborating the analogy Piaget proposed between consciousness and the relation of form and content.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Experimenting in Relation to Piaget: Education is a Chaperoned Process of Adaptation.Jeremy Trevelyan Burman - 2008 - Perspectives on Science 16 (2):pp. 160-195.
Similar books and articles
Topometric Spaces and Perturbations of Metric Structures.Ben Yaacov Itaï - 2008 - Logic and Analysis 1 (3-4):235-272.
A Connecticut Yalie in King Descartes' Court.Eric Dietrich & Valerie Gray Hardcastle - 2002 - Newsletter of Cognitive Science Society (Now Defunct).
The Metacognitive Loop I: Enhancing Reinforcement Learning with Metacognitive Monitoring and Control for Improved Perturbation Tolerance||.Michael Anderson - manuscript
From Neural Constructivism to Cognitive Constructivism: The Steps to Be Taken.Andreas Demetriou - 2000 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (5):781-782.
Epistemological and Theoretical Foundations of Constructivist Cognitive Therapies: Post-Rationalist Developments.Juan Balbi - 2008 - Dialogues in Philosophy, Mental and Neuro Sciences 1 (1):15-27.
The Computational and Experimental Complexity of Gene Perturbations for Regulatory Network Search.Clark Glymour - unknown
Student-Centred Philosophy.Venera-Mihaela Cojocariu - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 37:35-41.
Different Conceptions of Stage in Theories of Cognitive and Moral Development.Jan Boom - 1989 - Journal of Moral Education 18 (3):208-217.
Neural Constructivism or Self-Organization?Peter C. M. Molenaar & Han L. J. van der Maas - 2000 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (5):783-784.
Hume's Changing Views on the 'Durability' of Scepticism.Brian Ribeiro - 2009 - Journal of Scottish Philosophy 7 (2):215-236.
Deconstructing Neural Constructivism.Olaf Sporns - 1997 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 20 (4):576-577.
Neoconstructivism: A Unifying Constraint for the Cognitive Sciences.Stevan Harnad - 1982 - In Thomas W. Simon & Robert J. Scholes (eds.), [Book Chapter]. Lawrence Erlbaum. pp. 1-11.
Added to index2010-11-01
Total downloads34 ( #150,458 of 2,164,828 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #188,443 of 2,164,828 )
How can I increase my downloads?