Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C 42 (1):12-19 (2011)
Considering the variety of contradictory definitions which have been attributed to the term in the course of more than a century, one may be tempted to admit that ‘Social Darwinism’ can be reduced to a social myth. But it seems nevertheless necessary to answer the question: what has been called ‘Social Darwinism’ for more than one century and why was the expression used in a negative way to express contradictory opinions which sometimes have nothing to do with Darwin’s theory.What we still call ‘Social Darwinism’ is the result of a misunderstanding: the theories expressed under that phrase have little to do with the Darwinian concepts of natural selection or descent with modification. They have their origin in a pre-darwinian conception of the struggle for existence, which Darwin used in a metaphorical sense.This confusion will then appear to refer clearly to the relationship we establish between biology and society, whether biological laws are directly prolonged in society, or more or less intermingle in a close network. The issue of the definition of Social Darwinism depends obviously on the possible answers to this question, and so does the issue of redefining Darwinism at large
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Phenomenology and Social Reality.Alfred Schutz & Maurice Alexander Natanson (eds.) - 1970 - The Hague: M. Nijhoff.
Getting It Wrong: Ten of the Greatest Misreported Stories in American Journalism.W. Joseph Campbell - 2010 - University of California Press.
Added to index2012-03-03
Total downloads23 ( #221,171 of 2,178,017 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #166,370 of 2,178,017 )
How can I increase my downloads?