The actor and the spectator

New Haven: Yale University Press (1975)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Can a machine think? More pointedly, if I am a machine, can I think? Beck answers these questions by analyzing two clusters of metaphors -- one of which dramatizes human beings as spontaneous agents (actors), and the other sees them as observers attempting to explain causally their own behavior and that of the actor (spectators). Using a hypothetical scene with two spectators, each explaining an action, and each representing a different way of viewing the world, Beck points up the central philosophical problems raised by the varieties of ways in which we explain our own actions and those of others.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The nature of human action.Myles Brand - 1970 - [Glenview, Ill.]: Scott, Foresman. Edited by William K. Frankena.
Agent, Actor, Spectator, and Critic.Lewis White Beck - 1965 - The Monist 49 (2):167-182.
The Actor and the Spectator. [REVIEW]Leon J. Goldstein - 1976 - International Studies in Philosophy 8:191-191.
The actor and the spectator.Stephen L. Darwall - 1977 - Philosophia 7 (1):197-203.
Between Actor and Spectator: Arnout Geulincx and the Stoics.Ruben Buys - 2010 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 18 (5):741-761.
A simple theory of promising.David Owens - 2006 - Philosophical Review 115 (1):51-77.
The philosophy of action.Alan R. White - 1968 - London,: Oxford University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
53 (#293,652)

6 months
12 (#203,353)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references