The Current Debate Concerning the Epistemic Value of Religious Experience

Dissertation, The Southern Baptist Theological Seminary (1996)

Abstract
This dissertation assessed the contemporary debate concerning the epistemic value of religious experience and proposed a future direction for building a substantial case for the epistemic value of religious experience. ;In the last few years, several new attempts to address the epistemic validity of religious experience have emerged. These new efforts tend to be more subtle than past attempts and are more modest in their assertions. While there are still assertions that religious experience has no epistemic validity , there are efforts which affirm that religious experience gives some information about reality. Chapter 1 introduced this debate and typed the categories of religious experience. ;Chapter 2 discussed the skeptical position of the work of Michael Martin, professor of philosophy at Boston University, who, in his recent book, has asserted that religious experience has no value. It is concluded that while some of Martin's critiques are valid, his presuppositions preclude any chance of finding epistemic value in religious experience. ;Chapter 3 examined the psycho-social approach of Wayne Proudfoot, who accepted the reality of religious experience to the subject of the experience and noted that religious experiences have meaning only within their own religious context. Proudfoot discussed religious experience within its language-game and argued against a simple reductionism. However, his own style of reduction prevented him from assigning epistemic value to religious experience. ;Chapter 4 examined the work of William Alston, of Syracuse University, who believed that the perception of religious experience has cognitive value, able to give information about God, and even more specifically, about being Christian. Alston's innovative work in epistemology grants a greater warrant than other epistemologies to religious belief, thus allowing religious experience to be granted an epistemic value. Alston used religious experience as part of a cumulative argument for the Christian God. ;Chapter 5 evaluated the strengths and weakness of each of these writers. In the light of critical assessment of these writers and Alston's modified epistemology, this dissertation proposed a case for the epistemic value of religious experience based on perception and doxastic practice
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 43,694
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Religious Experience and Epistemic Justification: Alston on the Reliability of Mystical Perception.Christoph Jäger - 2002 - In Carlos Ulises Moulines and Karl-Georg Niebergall (ed.), Argument und Analyse. mentis. pp. 403-423.
Lewis on Experience, Reason, and Religious Belief.Eugene Thomas Long - 1981 - Review of Metaphysics 35 (1):87 - 109.
Religious Pluralism and the Rationality of Religious Belief.John Hick - 1993 - Faith and Philosophy 10 (2):242-249.
William P. Alston's Theory of the Epistemology of Religious Experience.Ramazan Erturk - 1998 - Dissertation, The Catholic University of America

Analytics

Added to PP index
2015-02-06

Total views
0

Recent downloads (6 months)
0

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.

My notes

Sign in to use this feature