The Generality Constraint and the Structure of Thought

Mind 121 (483):563-600 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

According to the Generality Constraint, mental states with conceptual content must be capable of recombining in certain systematic ways. Drawing on empirical evidence from cognitive science, I argue that so-called analogue magnitude states violate this recombinability condition and thus have nonconceptual content. I further argue that this result has two significant consequences: it demonstrates that nonconceptual content seeps beyond perception and infiltrates cognition; and it shows that whether mental states have nonconceptual content is largely an empirical matter determined by the structure of the neural representations underlying them

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 107,650

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

An independent, empirical route to nonconceptual content.Monima Chadha - 2009 - Consciousness and Cognition 18 (2):439-448.
The Distinction between Conceptual and Nonconceptual Content.Jose Bermudez - 2007 - In Brian McLaughlin, Ansgar Beckermann & Sven Walter, The Oxford handbook of philosophy of mind. New York: Oxford University Press.
How to Think About Nonconceptual Content.Walter Hopp - 2010 - The New Yearbook for Phenomenology and Phenomenological Philosophy 10 (1):1-24.
Animal Mental Action: Planning Among Chimpanzees.Angelica Kaufmann - 2015 - Review of Philosophy and Psychology 6 (4):745-760.
Content, illusion, partition.York H. Gunther - 2001 - Philosophical Studies 102 (2):185-202.
Is there a problem about nonconceptual content?Jeff Speaks - 2005 - Philosophical Review 114 (3):359-98.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-10-11

Downloads
456 (#71,550)

6 months
25 (#145,775)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Jacob Beck
York University

Citations of this work

The Border Between Seeing and Thinking.Ned Block - 2023 - New York, US: OUP USA.
Are there different kinds of content?Richard Heck - 2007 - In Brian P. McLaughlin & Jonathan Cohen, Contemporary Debates in Philosophy of Mind. Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 117-138.

View all 45 citations / Add more citations