Authors
Valentin Beck
Freie Universität Berlin
Abstract
This article focuses on the challenge of determining the relative weight of domestic and global justice demands. This problem concerns a variety of views that differ on the metric, function, scope, grounds and fundamental interpretation of justice norms. I argue that domestic and global economic justice are irreducibly interdependent. In order to address their exact relation, I discuss and compare three theoretical models: the bottom-up-approach, which prioritizes domestic justice; the top-down-approach, which prioritizes global justice; and the horizontal framework, according to which both domestic and global principles pose equally stringent demands that are to be implemented horizontally, without attributing a simple priority to one over the other. I argue that the third model represents the best overall framework, although more complex normative criteria need to be elaborated on the basis of this approach, affecting issues such as justice in climate change mitigation and adaption, development cooperation, trade, finance, taxation and immigration.
Keywords Global Justice  Social Justice  Global Distristibutive Justice  Economic Justice  Climate Justice  Justice in trade
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1515/yewph-2020-0009
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Justice as Fairness: A Restatement.John Rawls (ed.) - 2001 - Harvard University Press.
What is the Point of Equality.Elizabeth Anderson - 1999 - Ethics 109 (2):287-337.
Political Theory and International Relations.Charles R. Beitz - 1979 - Princeton: Princeton University Press.

View all 23 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Implication of Rawls' Approach to Public Reason.Xin Liu - 2011 - Frontiers of Philosophy in China 6 (1):161-169.
Between Domestic and Global Justice.Shmuel Nili - 2014 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 11 (4):55-81.
Reasonable Partiality for Compatriots and the Global Responsibility Gap.Robert Der Veevann - 2008 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 11 (4):413-432.
Global Health Justice and Governance.Jennifer Prah Ruger - 2012 - American Journal of Bioethics 12 (12):35-54.
No Justice Without Democracy: A Deliberative Approach to the Global Distribution of Wealth.Stefan Rummens - 2009 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 17 (5):657-680.
Is Rooted Cosmopolitanism Bad for Women?Kathryn Walker - 2012 - Journal of Global Ethics 8 (1):77-90.
On the Usefulness of Luck Egalitarian Arguments for Global Justice.Christian Schemmel - 2008 - Global Justice: Theory Practice Rhetoric 1:54-67.
On the Usefulness of Luck Egalitarian Arguments for Global Justice.Christian Schemmel - 2008 - Global Justice Theory Practice Rhetoric 1:54-67.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2020-05-09

Total views
73 ( #156,091 of 2,498,533 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
11 ( #67,692 of 2,498,533 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes