Why What Is Counterfactual Really Matters: A Response to Weisberg and Gopnik ()

Cognitive Science 40 (1):253-256 (2016)

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Download options

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 72,722

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-04-05

Downloads
32 (#361,217)

6 months
1 (#387,390)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Sarah Beck
University of Birmingham

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references

Similar books and articles

Response to Rosenthal and Weisberg.N. Block - 2011 - Analysis 71 (3):443-448.
Response to Goodrich on the Antirrhetic.Richard Weisberg - 1992 - Cardozo Studies in Law and Literature 4 (2):237-242.
Counterfactuals, Probabilities, and Information: Response to Critics.Aaron Meskin & Jonathan Cohen - 2008 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 86 (4):635 – 642.