Scientific autonomy and the unpredictability of scientific inquiry: The unexpected might not be where you would expect

Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 73:1-7 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,117

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The unexpected realist.William H. Krieger & Brian L. Keeley - 2006 - In Brian L. Keeley (ed.), Paul Churchland. Cambridge University Press.
Scientific Problems: Three Empiricist Models.Thomas Nickles - 1980 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1980:3 - 19.
Collective Scientific Knowledge.Melinda Fagan - 2012 - Philosophy Compass 7 (12):821-831.
What Are the New Implications of Chaos for Unpredictability?Charlotte Werndl - 2009 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 60 (1):195-220.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-08-10

Downloads
42 (#346,790)

6 months
5 (#366,001)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

The Value of Surprise in Science.Steven French & Alice Murphy - 2023 - Erkenntnis 88 (4):1447-1466.
Scientific inertia in animal-based research in biomedicine.Simon Lohse - 2021 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 89 (C):41-51.
Revisiting the Basic/Applied Science Distinction: The Significance of Urgent Science for Science Funding Policy.Jamie Shaw - 2022 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 53 (4):477-499.

View all 6 citations / Add more citations