Framing the debate between computational and dynamical approaches to cognitive science

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (5):630-630 (1998)
Abstract
van Gelder argues that computational and dynamical systems are mathematically distinct kinds of systems. Although there are real experimental and theoretical differences between adopting a computational or dynamical perspective on cognition, and the dynamical approach has much to recommend it, the debate cannot be framed this rigorously. Instead, what is needed is careful study of concrete models to improve our intuitions.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/S0140525X98231736
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 26,769
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Dynamical Approaches to Cognitive Science.Randall D. Beer - 2000 - Trends in Cognitive Sciences 4 (3):91-99.
Choking RECtified: Embodied Expertise Beyond Dreyfus.Daniel D. Hutto & Raúl Sánchez-García - 2015 - Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 14 (2):309-331.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2009-01-28

Total downloads

75 ( #69,052 of 2,158,890 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

1 ( #353,777 of 2,158,890 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums