Philosophical Psychology 29 (6):912-929 (2016)

David Sackris
Arapahoe Community College
James R. Beebe
State University of New York, Buffalo
We report the results of two studies that examine folk metaethical judgments about the objectivity of morality. We found that participants attributed almost as much objectivity to ethical statements as they did to statements of physical fact and significantly more objectivity to ethical statements than to statements about preferences or tastes. In both studies, younger participants attributed less objectivity to ethical statements than older participants. Females were observed to attribute slightly less objectivity to ethical statements than males, and we found important interactions between attributions of objectivity and other factors, such as how strong participants’ moral opinions were and how much disagreement about the issue they perceived to exist within society. We believe our results have significant implications for debates about the nature of folk morality and about the nature of morality in general.
Keywords moral psychology  metaethics  objectivitism  subjectivism  relativism  folk morality
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1080/09515089.2016.1174843
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 71,248
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Revisiting Folk Moral Realism.Thomas Pölzler - 2017 - Review of Philosophy and Psychology 8 (2):455-476.

View all 42 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Definition of a Moral Judgment.Timothy L. S. Sprigge - 1964 - Philosophy 39 (150):301 - 322.
After Objectivity: An Empirical Study of Moral Judgment.Shaun Nichols - 2004 - Philosophical Psychology 17 (1):3 – 26.
Why I Am an Objectivist About Ethics (And Why You Are, Too).David Enoch - 2014 - In Russ Shafer Landau (ed.), The Ethical Life, 3rd ed. Oxford University Press.
Moral Objectivity: A Kantian Illusion?Carla Bagnoli - 2015 - Journal of Value Inquiry 49 (1-2):31-45.
Ethical Scepticism and the Decision to Be Moral.Teresa Elizabeth Mcgarrity - 1993 - Dissertation, State University of New York at Buffalo
Moore’s Paradox and Moral Motivation.Michael Cholbi - 2009 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 12 (5):495-510.
Objectivity in Law and Morals.Brian Leiter (ed.) - 2000 - Cambridge University Press.


Added to PP index

Total views
76 ( #153,606 of 2,518,495 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
4 ( #167,146 of 2,518,495 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes