Abstract
This paper argues, mainly on the basis of Rawls''s savings principle, Wissenburg''s restraint principle, Passmore's chains of love, and De-Shalit's transgenerational communities, for a double interpretation of sustainable development as a principle of intergenerational justice and a future-oriented green ideal. This double interpretation (1) embraces the restraint principle and the argument that no individualcan claim an unconditional right to destroy environmental goods as a baseline that could justify directive strategies for government intervention in non-sustainable lifestyles, and (2) suggests that people's concerns about the deterioration of nature and the environment articulate future-oriented narratives of self-identity that could fuel non-directive strategies to develop further responsibilities towards nearby future generations. Sustainable development, thus, provides sound arguments to restrict people's freedom to follow their own lifestyles, when these lifestyles transgress the baseline of the restraint principle. However, the individual freedom of choice should not be restricted for any further environmental considerations. Non-directive strategies are thus to stimulate the development of such further responsibilities towards nearby future generations
Keywords future generations  ideals  justice  sustainable development
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1023/B:JAGE.0000010842.88648.36
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 70,091
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Tyranny of Principles.Stephen Toulmin - 1981 - Hastings Center Report 11 (6):31-39.
Justice Between Generations.Jane English - 1977 - Philosophical Studies 31 (2):91 - 104.

View all 11 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

A Dynamic Stakeholder Model: An Other‐Oriented Ethical Approach.Akram Hatami & Naser Firoozi - 2019 - Business Ethics: A European Review 28 (3):349-360.
Climate Change Mitigation, Sustainability and Non-Substitutability.Säde Hormio - 2017 - In Adrian Walsh, Säde Hormio & Duncan Purves (eds.), The Ethical Underpinnings of Climate Economics. London, UK: pp. 103-121.
Intergenerational Impartiality: Replacing Discounting by Probability Weighting. [REVIEW]Yew-Kwang Ng - 2005 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 18 (3):237-257.

View all 11 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Identity and (Legal) Rights of Future Generations.Ori J. Herstein - 2009 - The George Washington Law Review 77:1173.
Environmental Ethics and Intergenerational Equity.Robin Attfield - 1998 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 41 (2):207 – 222.
Markets, Justice, and the Interests of Future Generations.Clark Wolf - 1996 - Ethics and the Environment 1 (2):153 - 175.
Green Politics.Stephen Rainbow - 1993 - Oxford University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
120 ( #97,431 of 2,506,353 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #209,812 of 2,506,353 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes