Nursing Ethics 5 (4):294-306 (1998)

Euthanasia has once again become headline news in the UK, with the announcement by Dr Michael Irwin, a former medical director of the United Nations, that he has helped at least 50 people to die, including two between February and July 1997. He has been quoted as saying that his ‘conscience is clear’ and that the time has come to confront the issue of euthanasia. For the purposes of this article, the term ‘beneficent voluntary active euthanasia’ (BVAE) will be used: beneficent from the prima facie principle of beneficence, to do good, and voluntary to indicate that this must be carried out at the request of a competent client. This implies adherence to another prima facie principle, that of respect for autonomy. Active implies that something is done or given with the intention of hastening death. The word euthanasia itself simply means ‘good death’. This article examines the moral positions of two nurses and one junior doctor towards the subject of BVAE and an attempt is made to represent the main conflicting moral positions. The central arguments against BVAE and counterarguments are presented. The conclusion reached is that consenting adults should not be prevented from availing themselves of BVAE if another consenting adult (a medical doctor) is available and capable of carrying out their wishes. This being the case, it is suggested that BVAE should be available as an option in hospices and in the community. The aims of this article are: to generate debate among professionals; to present a three-way discussion that might be useful as a focus for educational purposes, particularly at undergraduate level; to challenge professionals to confront the issue of euthanasia; and to plead the case of those who request assistance in exercising autonomy by gaining control over their own deaths
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1177/096973309800500403
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 69,043
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

A Case Against Dutch Euthanasia.Richard Fenigsen - 1989 - Hastings Center Report 19 (1):22-30.
The Challenge of Definition.C. Everett Koop - 1989 - Hastings Center Report 19 (1):2-3.

View all 7 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Moral Intuition, Good Deaths and Ordinary Medical Practitioners.M. Parker - 1990 - Journal of Medical Ethics 16 (1):28-34.
Not in My Name.Jacqueline A. Laing - 2012 - New Law Journal 162:81.
Euphemisms for Euthanasia.Derek Sellman - 1995 - Nursing Ethics 2 (4):315-319.


Added to PP index

Total views
39 ( #288,737 of 2,498,734 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #211,850 of 2,498,734 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes