Heraclitus against the Naïve Paratactic Metaphysics of Mere Things

Ancient Philosophy Today 3 (1):74-97 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article considers an interpretative model for the study of Heraclitus, which was first put forward by Alexander Mourelatos in 1973, and draws upon a related model put forward by Julius Moravcsik beginning in 1983. I further develop this combined model and provide a motivation for an interpretation of Heraclitus. This is also of interest for modern metaphysics due to the recurrence of structurally similar problems, including the ‘colour exclusion’ problem that was faced by Wittgenstein. Further, I employ the model to shed new light on Heraclitus’ image of the river, while relating potential readings to various contemporary metaphysical views.

Other Versions

No versions found

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-04-07

Downloads
820 (#22,923)

6 months
224 (#14,600)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Keith Begley
Durham University

Citations of this work

Heraclitean Flux Metaphysics.Andrew Dennis Bassford - 2023 - Metaphysica: International Journal for Ontology and Metaphysics 24 (2):299-322.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Tractatus logico-philosophicus.Ludwig Wittgenstein - 1922 - Filosoficky Casopis 52:336-341.
Semantic theory.Jerrold J. Katz - 1972 - New York,: Harper & Row.
The Blue and Brown Books.Ludwig Wittgenstein - 1958 - Philosophy 34 (131):367-368.
The route of Parmenides.Alexander P. D. Mourelatos - 1970 - New Haven,: Yale University Press.

View all 37 references / Add more references