Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 20 (3):551-565 (2017)
AbstractRecent calls for reinstituting mandatory home economics education have emphasized its potential to advance gender egalitarian aims. The thought is that, because women’s disproportionate performance of caregiving and household labor is partially caused by gender socialization that better prepares women than men for such work, we can disrupt gender inegalitarian work distributions by preparing everyone for the sort of work in question. The curricula envisioned in these calls are gender-neutral, in the sense that they recommend identical educational interventions for all genders. By exploiting a parallel between gender-neutral educational policies and gender-neutral family leave policies, we argue first that gender-neutral home economics instruction is unlikely to advance gender egalitarian aims, and may in fact reinforce the very outcomes it is meant to disrupt. However, we further argue that a more radical home economics curriculum could avoid these difficulties. To the extent that we value educational interventions as a possible means for advancing gender egalitarian aims, we have good reason to seriously consider adopting a gender non-neutral program in which all and only boys receive mandatory caregiving instruction.
Similar books and articles
Basic Income, Gender Justice and the Costs of Gender-Symmetrical Lifestyles.Anca Gheaus - 2008 - Basic Income Studies 3 (3).
Citizenship, Reciprocity, and the Gendered Division of Labor: A Stability Argument for Gender Egalitarian Political Interventions.Gina Schouten - 2017 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 16 (2):174-209.
The Selfish Gender, or the Reproduction of Gender Asymmetry in Gender Studies.T. V. Barchunova - 2003 - Studies in East European Thought 55 (1):3-25.
The Routledgefalmer Reader in Gender & Education.Madeleine Arnot & Mairtin Mac An Ghaill (eds.) - 2006 - Routledge.
A Dispositional Account of Gender.Jennifer McKitrick - 2015 - Philosophical Studies 172 (10):2575-2589.
Gender-Segregated Schooling and Gender Stereotyping.Richard A. Fabes, Erin Pahlke, Carol Lynn Martin & Laura D. Hanish - 2013 - Educational Studies 39 (3):315-319.
Gender Reality.Sr Mary Prudence Allen - 2014 - Solidarity: The Journal for Catholic Social Thought and Secular Ethics 4 (1):Article 1.
Gender.Anca Gheaus - 2018 - In Serena Olsaretti (ed.), Oxford Handbook of Distributive Justice. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. pp. 389-414.
Who's Afraid of Stella Walsh? On Gender, 'Gene Cheaters', and the Promises of Cyborg Athletes.Kutte Jönsson - 2007 - Sport, Ethics and Philosophy 1 (2):239 – 262.
Gender and Educational Achievement.Andreas Hadjar, Sabine Krolak-Schwerdt, Karin Priem & Sabine Glock (eds.) - 2016 - Routledge.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Justice, Autonomy and Care: Symposium on Asha Bhandary’s Freedom to Care: Liberalism, Dependency Care and Justice.Amy Mullin - 2022 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 25 (6):809-815.
References found in this work
Collected Papers. [REVIEW]Thomas E. Hill & John Rawls - 2001 - Journal of Philosophy 98 (5):269-272.
Equality-Promoting Parental Leave.Anca Gheaus & Ingrid Robeyns - 2011 - Journal of Social Philosophy 42 (2):173-191.