Setting the Stage for Deception. Perspective Distortion in World War I Camouflage

Abstract

During World War I, in response to substantial advancements in wartime surveillance, it became a common practice to rely on “vision specialists” to devise effective methods of fooling the enemy. These methods, collectively referred to now as camouflage, were designed by so-called camoufleurs, men who in civilian life had been trained as artists, graphic designers, architects, and theatre scenographers. Among the techniques they employed were perspective-based spatial distortions, of the sort that are also frequently used in theatrical set design, trompe l’oeil paintings, and wildlife displays. This paper describes these methods, explains how they were intended to work, and discusses their effectiveness.

Download options

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 72,766

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-11-18

Downloads
14 (#738,565)

6 months
1 (#386,989)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Resemblance and Camouflage in Graeco-Roman Antiquity.Massimo Leone - 2010 - Sign Systems Studies 38 (1/4):167-184.
The Paintings of Ibrahim Nubani.Ayelet Zohar - 2011 - Theory, Culture and Society 28 (1):3-33.
Painting, Sculpture, Sight, and Touch.Robert Hopkins - 2004 - British Journal of Aesthetics 44 (2):149-166.
The Gamble of the Gaze: Anamorphosis and the Problem of Pictorial Illusion.Lyle Massey - 1995 - Dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles
Deception and Mutual Trust: A Reply to Strudler.Peter C. Cramton - 1995 - Business Ethics Quarterly 5 (4):823-832.
Application of Natural Deduction in Renaissance Geometry.Mirek Ryszard - 2014 - Argument: Biannual Philosophical Journal 4 (2):425-438.