The Duplicity of Representation: A Critique

Dissertation, Stanford University (1997)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The dissertation researches the conditions of possibility of representation both in terms of original theoretical considerations of the nature of the mathematical and the function of projection inspired by Martin Heidegger and through close readings of some of his and other representative literary, philosophical, and critical French and German texts on the topic ranging from the seventeenth to the twentieth century. ;The thesis demonstrates that representation of objects is not grounded in a principle of likeness such as resemblance or structural analogy between an object and its representation, but is conditional upon self-representation. This self-representation posits and thereby founds itself through an act of self-projection which realizes what it throws forth at the same time. At the basis of self-representation is therefore a unity which is not one, which, rather, is constituted by duplicity: the duplicity of thing and movement, as in a top, whose spinning on the spot lets it appear as an object. This duplicity or doubleness unfolds into a threeness, for the projection, as a prescription and its enactment, that is, its self-reflexive repetition in the same place, also generates a third, which is nothing but the duplicity of the first two--the connection between them. This third necessarily inheres in the form of duplicity which has created it. ;This principle of a projection which is both ec-static and self-contained is enacted in the Cartesian cogito, which initiates the age of the world as picture. As Heidegger shows, the epistemological subject in modernity likewise only becomes possible on the basis of self-representation. The question of what has priority, the subject or representation, is thus wrongly posed--it is self-representation which precedes both. ;Close readings and, at times, critiques, of Heidegger's What is a Thing? and "The Age of the World Picture" , Michel Foucault's theory of representation as--faultily--derived from the Logic of Port-Royal , and Klopstock's poetics of "Darstellung" each develop different facets of the thesis on self-representation

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,423

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The traumatic origins of representation.Peter Poiana - 2013 - Continental Philosophy Review 46 (1):1-19.
Varieties of visual representation.John Dilworth - 2002 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 32 (2):183-206.
The Naturalism of Pictorial Representation.Douglas John Dempster - 1983 - Dissertation, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Mental representation: A functionalist view.Robert Van Gulick - 1982 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 63 (1):3-20.
Representation of a representation: Reflections on las meninas.Rocco J. Gennaro - 2008 - Journal of Consciousness Studies 15 (9):47-50.
Biosemantics.Ruth Garrett Millikan - 1989 - Journal of Philosophy 86 (July):281-97.
Representation as a cognitive instrument.Frank Ankersmit - 2013 - History and Theory 52 (2):171-193.
A General Theory of Representation.Jennifer Irene Hudin - 2003 - Dissertation, University of California, Berkeley
Representation is Democracy.David Plotke - 1997 - Constellations 4 (1):19-34.
The dynamics of situations.François Recanati - 1997 - European Review of Philosophy 2:41-75.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-02-06

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references