Social Philosophy and Policy 1 (2):172 (1984)
Professor Flathman's main aim in this interesting paper is to set forth what we might call the “moderation thesis.” It holds that there may be occasions when the best thing to do, all things considered, is to violate a right – at least if the violation takes the form of what Flathman calls “civil encroachment” or “civil non-enforcement.” Moreover, it would be desirable, in a society whose practices include rights, for this belief to be generally accepted, so that those who engaged with good reason in “civil encroachment” would receive the sympathetic support of the community. Let me begin by trying to explain the source of the problem to which this thesis is a response. As Flathman notes, rights have a discretionary character: if I have a right to do or to have something, it is up to me whether to do it or to have it. Having a right, I am entitled to make a choice. Since we cannot say, in advance, what choice I will make, we cannot say, in advance, what will be the state of the world after I make it. But since it seems plain that some states of the world are more desirable than others, it will always be possible that the consequences of my choice will be worse, on the whole, than the consequences of some other choice that I might have made but did not. To moderate rights is apparently to act in ways that redress or compensate for the undesirable results of their exercise
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Rights, Needs, and Liberalism: A Comment on Bay.Richard E. Flathman - 1980 - Political Theory 8 (3):319-330.
Some Familiar but False Dichotomies Concerning "Interests": A Comment on Benditt and Oppenheim.Richard E. Flathman - 1975 - Political Theory 3 (3):277-287.
Peace, Human Rights, and Human Needs: A Comment on the Bay‐Flathman Debate.Joseph H. Carens - 1985 - Journal of Social Philosophy 16 (1):25-32.
Review: Forms and Limits of Utilitarianism. [REVIEW]Richard E. Flathman - 1966 - Ethics 76 (4):309 - 317.
On Needs and Rights Beyond Liberalism: A Rejoinder to Flathman.Christian Bay - 1980 - Political Theory 8 (3):331-334.
Book Review:Toward a Liberalism. Richard E. Flathman. [REVIEW]James T. Kloppenberg - 1992 - Ethics 102 (4):865-.
Freedom and its Conditions: Discipline, Autonomy, and Resistance.Richard E. Flathman - 2003 - Routledge.
"It All Depends...On How One Understands Liberalism": A Brief Response to Stephen Macedo.Richard E. Flathman - 1998 - Political Theory 26 (1):81-84.
Added to index2010-08-31
Total downloads5 ( #582,363 of 2,143,472 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #386,634 of 2,143,472 )
How can I increase my downloads?
There are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.