Mind and Matter 2 (2):29-51 (2004)
Classical cognitive science assumes that intelligently behaving systems must be symbol processors that are implemented in physical systems such as brains or digital computers. By contrast, connectionists suppose that symbol manipulating systems could be approximations of neural networks dynamics. Both classicists and connectionists argue that symbolic computation and subsymbolic dynamics are incompatible, though on different grounds. While classicists say that connectionist architectures and symbol processors are either incompatible or the former are mere implementations of the latter, connectionists reply that neural networks might be incompatible with symbol processors because the latter cannot be implementations of the former. In this contribution, the notions of 'incompatibility' and 'implementation' will be criticized to show that they must be revised in the context of the dynamical system approach to cognitive science. Examples for implementations of symbol processors that are incompatible with respect to contextual topologies will be discussed
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Quantum Cognition and Bounded Rationality.Reinhard Blutner & Peter Beim Graben - forthcoming - Synthese:1-53.
Similar books and articles
Creativity of Metaphor in Perceptual Symbol Systems.Bipin Indurkhya - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (4):621-622.
Summary.D. J. Chalmers - 2013 - Theoria: Revista de Teoría, Historia y Fundamentos de la Ciencia 28 (1):171-173.
Grounding Symbols in Sensorimotor Categories with Neural Networks.Stevan Harnad - 1995 - Institute of Electrical Engineers Colloquium on "Grounding Representations.
Notationality and the Information Processing Mind.Vinod Goel - 1991 - Minds and Machines 1 (2):129-166.
Symbol Grounding and the Symbolic Theft Hypothesis.Angelo Cangelosi, Alberto Greco & Stevan Harnad - 2002 - In A. Cangelosi & D. Parisi (eds.), Simulating the Evolution of Language. Springer Verlag. pp. 191--210.
Symbol Systems.Michael L. Anderson & Donald R. Perlis - 2002 - In L. Nagel (ed.), Encyclopedia of Cognitive Science. Macmillan.
Computation is Just Interpretable Symbol Manipulation; Cognition Isn't.Stevan Harnad - 1994 - Minds and Machines 4 (4):379-90.
Situated Action, Symbol Systems and Universal Computation.Andrew Wells - 1996 - Minds and Machines 6 (1):33-46.
Perceptual Symbols in Language Comprehension: Can an Empirical Case Be Made?Rolf A. Zwaan, Robert A. Stanfield & Carol J. Madden - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (4):636-637.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads44 ( #115,208 of 2,153,497 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #184,837 of 2,153,497 )
How can I increase my downloads?