Privileged, typical, or not even that? – Our place in the world according to the copernican and the cosmological principles
Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 37 (2):225 - 256 (2006)
If we are to constrain our place in the world, two principles are often appealed to in science. According to the Copernican Principle, we do not occupy a privileged position within the Universe. The Cosmological Principle, on the other hand, says that our observations would roughly be the same, if we were located at any other place in the Universe. In our paper we analyze these principles from a logical and philosophical point of view. We show how they are related, how they can be supported and what use is made of them. Our main results are: 1. There is a logical gap between both principles insofar as the Cosmological Principle is significantly stronger than the Copernican Principle. 2. A step that is often taken for establishing the Cosmological Principle on the base of the Copernican Principle and observations is not incontestable as it stands, but can be supplemented with a different argument. 3. The Cosmological Principle might be crucial for cosmology to the extent it is not supported by empirical evidence.
|Keywords||Cosmology Cosmological Principle Copernican Principle|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
The Measure of the Universe.J. D. North - 1967 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 18 (3):257-259.
Relativity, Gravitation, and World-Structure.E. A. Milne - 1936 - Philosophical Review 45 (3):324-325.
Implications of the Copernican Principle for Our Future Prospects.J. Richard Gott - 1993 - Nature 363:315-319.
Citations of this work BETA
Can We Justifiably Assume the Cosmological Principle in Order to Break Model Underdetermination in Cosmology?Claus Beisbart - 2009 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 40 (2):175-205.
On Under-Determination in Cosmology.Jeremy Butterfield - 2014 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 46 (1):57-69.
Underdetermination in Cosmology: An Invitation.Jeremy Butterfield - 2012 - Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 86 (1):1-18.
Does Inflation Solve the Hot Big Bang Model׳s Fine-Tuning Problems?C. D. McCoy - 2015 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 51:23-36.
On the Contributions of Astroparticle Physics to Cosmology.Brigitte Falkenburg - 2014 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 46 (1):97-108.
Similar books and articles
On the Cosmological Indeterminacy Principle of Mccrae.Carlton W. Berenda - 1964 - Philosophy of Science 31 (3):265-270.
Regresses, Sufficient Reasons, and Cosmological Arguments.Patrick Francken & Heimir Geirsson - 1999 - Journal of Philosophical Research 24:285-304.
Modern Cosmology and Some Implications for Religion.Joel Primack - 2005 - Faith and Philosophy 22 (5):615-621.
The Cosmological Argument Without the Principle of Sufficient Reason.Elmar J. Kremer - 1997 - Faith and Philosophy 14 (1):62-70.
Copernicus, Kant, and the Anthropic Cosmological Principles.S. Roush - 2003 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B 34 (1):5-35.
Faulty Reasoning About Default Principles in Cosmological Arguments.Graham Oppy - 2004 - Faith and Philosophy 21 (2):242-249.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads59 ( #87,689 of 2,158,669 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #354,589 of 2,158,669 )
How can I increase my downloads?