Privileged, Typical, or not even that? – Our Place in the World According to the Copernican and the Cosmological Principles
Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 37 (2):225-256 (2006)
If we are to constrain our place in the world, two principles are often appealed to in science. According to the Copernican Principle, we do not occupy a privileged position within the Universe. The Cosmological Principle, on the other hand, says that our observations would roughly be the same, if we were located at any other place in the Universe. In our paper we analyze these principles from a logical and philosophical point of view. We show how they are related, how they can be supported and what use is made of them. Our main results are: 1. There is a logical gap between both principles insofar as the Cosmological Principle is significantly stronger than the Copernican Principle. 2. A step that is often taken for establishing the Cosmological Principle on the base of the Copernican Principle and observations is not incontestable as it stands, but can be supplemented with a different argument. 3. The Cosmological Principle might be crucial for cosmology to the extent it is not supported by empirical evidence.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
The Measure of the Universe.J. D. North - 1967 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 18 (3):257-259.
Relativity, Gravitation, and World-Structure.E. A. Milne - 1936 - Philosophical Review 45 (3):324-325.
Implications of the Copernican Principle for Our Future Prospects.J. Richard Gott - 1993 - Nature 363:315-319.
Citations of this work BETA
On the Contributions of Astroparticle Physics to Cosmology.Brigitte Falkenburg - 2014 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 46 (1):97-108.
Similar books and articles
Privileged, Typical, or Not Even That? – Our Place in the World According to the Copernican and the Cosmological Principles.Claus Beisbart & Tobias Jung - 2006 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 37 (2):225 - 256.
Two Types of Cosmological Views.[author unknown] - 1977 - Contemporary Chinese Thought 9 (1):17-35.
Modern Cosmology and Some Implications for Religion.Joel Primack - 2005 - Faith and Philosophy 22 (5):615-621.
Il Posto Del Mondo Nell’Uomo. La Mondana Sapientia di Kant.Marco Russo - 2010 - Etica E Politica 12 (2):27-46.
Epistemological Foundations for Koons' Cosmological Argument?Graham Oppy - 2010 - European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 2 (1):107 - 125.
Copernicus, Kant, and the Anthropic Cosmological Principles.S. Roush - 2003 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 34 (1):5-35.
Self-Attributed Belief and Privileged Access.Beth A. Dixon - 1990 - Dissertation, University of Massachusetts Amherst
Cosmological Reconsiderations: The Ontological Status of Λ in the General Theory of Relativity.Stephen G. Dillingham - 2003 - Dissertation, The Johns Hopkins University
Leibniz and the Post-Copernican Universe. Koyre Revisited.R. M. - 2003 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 34 (2):309-327.
Seeing What You 'Re Doing'.John Gibbons - 2010 - In T. Szabo Gendler & J. Hawthorne (eds.), Oxford Studies in Epistemology. Oxford University Press.
Leibniz and the Post-Copernican Universe. Koyré Revisited.Maria Rosa Antognazza - 2003 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 34 (2):309-327.
Marxism-Leninism and the Copernican Revolution in Philosophy.Todor Pavlov - 1974 - Russian Studies in Philosophy 13 (1):4-23.
Added to index2016-02-04
Total downloads2 ( #778,003 of 2,178,174 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #316,504 of 2,178,174 )
How can I increase my downloads?