This is Part I of a two-part essay introducing case-intensional first-order logic, an easy-to-use, uniform, powerful, and useful combination of first order logic with modal logic resulting from philosophical and technical modifications of Bressan’s General interpreted modal calculus. CIFOL starts with a set of cases; each expression has an extension in each case and an intension, which is the function from the cases to the respective case-relative extensions. Predication is intensional; identity is extensional. Definite descriptions are context-independent terms, and lambda-predicates and -operators can be introduced without constraints. These logical resources allow one to define, within CIFOL, important properties of properties, viz., extensionality and absoluteness, Bressan’s chief innovation that allows tracing an individual across cases without recourse to any notion of “rigid designation” or “trans-world identity.” Thereby CIFOL abstains from incorporating any metaphysical principles into the quantificational machinery, unlike extant frameworks of quantified modal logic. We claim that this neutrality makes CIFOL a useful tool for discussing both metaphysical and scientific arguments involving modality and quantification, and we illustrate by discussing in diagrammatic detail a number of such arguments involving the extensional identification of individuals via absolute properties, essential properties, de re vs. de dicto, and the results of possible tests
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
BH-CIFOL: Case-Intensional First Order Logic.Nuel Belnap & Thomas Müller - 2013 - Journal of Philosophical Logic (2-3):1-32.
The Modal Object Calculus and its Interpretation.Edward N. Zalta - 1997 - In M. de Rijke (ed.), Advances in Intensional Logic. Kluwer Academic Publishers. pp. 249--279.
Extending Montague's System: A Three Valued Intensional Logic.E. H. Alves & J. A. D. Guerzoni - 1990 - Studia Logica 49 (1):127 - 132.
Scopeless Quantifiers and Operators.Thomas Ede Zimmermann - 1993 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 22 (5):545 - 561.
Intensional and Higher-Order Modal Logic: With Applications to Montague Semantics.Daniel Gallin - 1975 - American Elsevier Pub. Co..
Completeness in the Theory of Properties, Relations, and Propositions.George Bealer - 1983 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 48 (2):415-426.
Theories of Properties, Relations, and Propositions.George Bealer - 1979 - Journal of Philosophy 76 (11):634-648.
Are Wooden Tables Necessarily Wooden?Bjørn Jespersen & Pavel Materna - 2002 - Acta Analytica 17 (1):115-150.
A Comparison of Two Intensional Logics.Edward N. Zalta - 1988 - Linguistics and Philosophy 11 (1):59-89.
Necessities and Necessary Truths: A Prolegomenon to the Use of Modal Logic in the Analysis of Intensional Notions.V. Halbach & P. Welch - 2009 - Mind 118 (469):71-100.
Leibniz on Intension, Extension, and the Representation of Syllogistic Inference.O. Bradley Bassler - 1998 - Synthese 116 (2):117-139.
Completeness in Hybrid Type Theory.Carlos Areces, Patrick Blackburn, Antonia Huertas & María Manzano - 2013 - Journal of Philosophical Logic (2-3):1-30.
Intensional Completeness in an Extension of Gödel/Dummett Logic.Matt Fairtlough & Michael Mendler - 2003 - Studia Logica 73 (1):51 - 80.
Added to index2012-10-18
Total downloads26 ( #198,269 of 2,178,142 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #166,129 of 2,178,142 )
How can I increase my downloads?