The aim of this inquiry is to investigate Heidegger's ontology of technology. We will show that this ontology is aporetic. In Heidegger's key technical essays, ?The question concerning technology? and its earlier versions ?Enframing? and ?The danger?, enframing is described as the ontological basis of modern life. But the account of enframing is ambiguous. Sometimes it is described as totally binding and at other times it appears to allow for exceptions. This oscillation between, what we will call total enframing and partial enframing, is underscored in the work of two influential scholars of Heidegger's later thought, Hubert Dreyfus and Iain Thomson. We will show that like Heidegger, Dreyfus and Thomson unwittingly perpetuate this dilemma that ultimately covers up the aporetic structure of enframing
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1080/00201740903478376
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 70,091
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Nature and Technology in Modern Childbirth: A Phenomenological Interpretation.Dana S. Belu - 2012 - Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology 16 (1):3-15.
Heidegger, Technology and Education.Kurt C. M. Mertel - 2020 - Journal of Philosophy of Education 54 (2):467-486.

View all 6 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

What's Wrong with Being a Technological Essentialist? A Response to Feenberg.Iain Thomson - 2000 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 43 (4):429 – 444.
Heidegger's Aesthetics.Iain Thomson - 2010 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
The Ontic and the Ontological in Heidegger's Philosophy of Technology: Response to Thomson.Andrew Feenberg - 2000 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 43 (4):445 – 450.


Added to PP index

Total views
112 ( #104,437 of 2,506,107 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #416,984 of 2,506,107 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes