In John R. Shook & Sami Paavola (eds.), Abduction in Cognition and Action: Logical Reasoning, Scientific Inquiry, and Social Practice. Springer Verlag. pp. 107-127 (2021)

Authors
Abstract
Peirce’s claims that methodeutic “concerns abduction alone” and that “pragmatism contributes to the security of reasoning but hardly to its uberty” are explained. They match as soon as a third claim is taken into account, namely that “pragmatism is the logic of abduction,” not of deduction or induction. Since methodeutic concerns abduction and not deduction or induction, it follows that pragmatism is a maxim of methodeutic. Then, since pragmatism contributes to the security of reasoning but not to its uberty, it follows that methodeutic contributes to the security of the only reasoning it is concerned with, namely abduction. We then explain two related issues of methodeutic of abduction. First, in addition to the maxim of pragmatism, which suggests how to choose among experimental hypotheses contributing to the security of reasoning, there is the maxim of simplicity, which suggests hypotheses that are preferable for investment and which contributes to uberty of reasoning. Second, a third maxim of abduction is economy, which suggests adopting hypotheses that contribute to the advantageousness of reasoning even when pragmatism and simplicity cease to apply. These three maxims—experientiality for security, simplicity for uberty, and economy for advantageousness—are the bedrocks of Peirce’s methodeutic of abduction.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Buy the book Find it on Amazon.com
DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-61773-8_5
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 71,436
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Abduction as a Aspect of Retroduction.Phyllis Chiasson - 2001 - The Commens Encyclopedia: The Digital Encyclopedia of Peirce Studies.
Abduction Through Grammar, Critic, and Methodeutic.Sami Paavola - 2004 - Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 40 (2):245 - 270.
Peirce on the Justification of Abduction.Francesco Bellucci & Ahti-Veikko Pietarinen - 2020 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 84:12-19.
How Did Abduction Get Confused with Inference to the Best Explanation? Mcauliffe - 2015 - Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 51 (3):300-319.
How Did Abduction Get Confused with Inference to the Best Explanation? Mcauliffe - 2015 - Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 51 (3):300.
Methodeutic and the Order of Inquiry.Mats Bergman - 2018 - Semiotica 2018 (220):269-299.
Projectual Abduction.Giovanni Tuzet - 2006 - Logic Journal of the IGPL 14 (2):151-160.
Problems with Peirce's Concept of Abduction.Michael Hoffmann - 1999 - Foundations of Science 4 (3):271-305.
Guessing and Abduction. Tschaepe - 2014 - Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 50 (1):115.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2022-03-09

Total views
2 ( #1,453,779 of 2,520,366 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #270,555 of 2,520,366 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes