The rhetoric of antirealism and the copenhagen spirit

Philosophy of Science 63 (2):183-204 (1996)
Abstract
This paper argues against the possibility of presenting a consistent version of the Copenhagen Interpretation of Quantum Physics, characterizing its founders' philosophical pronouncements including those on the realism-antirealism issue, as a contingent collection of local, often contradictory, moves in changing theoretical and sociopolitical circumstances. The paper analyzes the fundamental differences of opinion between Bohr and the mathematical physicists, Heisenberg and Born, concerning the foundational doctrine of the "indispensability of classical concepts", and their related disagreements on "quantum reality." The paper concludes with an explanation of how the appearance of consensus was achieved despite fundamental disagreements among the proponents. The paper undermines the adequacy of the notion of a general conceptual framework to describe the philosophical endeavors of working scientists
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1086/289908
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 29,174
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Open or Closed? Dirac, Heisenberg, and the Relation Between Classical and Quantum Mechanics.Alisa Bokulich - 2004 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 35 (3):377-396.
'Against the Stream'—Schrödinger's Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics.Mara Beller - 1997 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 28 (3):421-432.
‘Against the Stream’—Schrödinger's Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics.Mara Beller - 1997 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 28 (3):421-432.
Open or Closed? Dirac, Heisenberg, and the Relation Between Classical and Quantum Mechanics.Alisa Bokulich - 2004 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 35 (3):377-396.

View all 6 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Quantum Logic and the Luders Rule.Allen Stairs - 1982 - Philosophy of Science 49 (3):422-436.
Copenhagen Computation.D. N. - 2003 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 34 (3):511-522.
“Ist Die Quantenphysik Vollständig?”.Holm Tetens - 1986 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 17 (1):96-118.
The Modal Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics.Gary M. Hardegree - 1976 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1976:82 - 103.
The Transactional Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics.John G. Cramer - 1986 - Reviews of Modern Physics 58 (3):647-687.
Constructing the Myth of the Copenhagen Interpretation.Kristian Camilleri - 2009 - Perspectives on Science 17 (1):pp. 26-57.
Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total downloads
55 ( #97,007 of 2,180,187 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #304,927 of 2,180,187 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums