Whither the responsibility to protect? Humanitarian intervention and the 2005 world summit

Ethics and International Affairs 20 (2):143–169 (2006)
Abstract
At the 2005 World Summit, the world's leaders committed themselves to the "responsibility to protect", recognizing both that all states have a responsibility to protect their citizens from genocide, war crimes, ethnic cleansing and crimes against humanity and that the UN should help states to discharge this responsibility using either peaceful means or enforcement action. This declaration ostensibly marks an important milestone in the relationship between sovereignty and human rights but its critics argue that it will make little difference in practice to the world's most threatened people. The purpose of this article is to ask how consensus was reached on the responsibility to protect, given continuing hostility to humanitarian intervention expressed by many (if not most) of the world's states and whether the consensus will contribute to avoiding future Kosovos (cases where the Security Council is deadlocked in the face of a humanitarian crises) and future Rwandas (cases where states lack the political will to intervene). It suggests that four key factors contributed to the consensus: pressure from proponents of the International Commission on Intervention and State Sovereignty, its adoption by Kofi Annan and the UN's High Level Panel, an emerging consensus in the African Union, and the American position. Whilst these four factors contributed to consensus, each altered the meaning of the responsibility to protect in important ways, creating a doctrine that many states can sign up to but that does little to prevent future Kosovos and Rwandas and may actually inhibit attempts to build a consensus around intervention in future cases
Keywords United Nations   Humanitarian intervention   Human rights   Consensus  360105 International Relations  C1  750701 Understanding international relations
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/j.1747-7093.2006.00012.x
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 25,767
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Religion, Violence, and Human Rights.James Turner Johnson - 2013 - Journal of Religious Ethics 41 (1):1-14.
Humanitarian Intervention and International Law: The Moral Importance of an Intervener's Legal Status.James Pattison - 2007 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 10 (3):301-319.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2009-01-28

Total downloads

232 ( #14,456 of 2,146,977 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

5 ( #162,483 of 2,146,977 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums