Ethics and International Affairs 20 (2):143–169 (2006)
At the 2005 World Summit, the world's leaders committed themselves to the "responsibility to protect", recognizing both that all states have a responsibility to protect their citizens from genocide, war crimes, ethnic cleansing and crimes against humanity and that the UN should help states to discharge this responsibility using either peaceful means or enforcement action. This declaration ostensibly marks an important milestone in the relationship between sovereignty and human rights but its critics argue that it will make little difference in practice to the world's most threatened people. The purpose of this article is to ask how consensus was reached on the responsibility to protect, given continuing hostility to humanitarian intervention expressed by many (if not most) of the world's states and whether the consensus will contribute to avoiding future Kosovos (cases where the Security Council is deadlocked in the face of a humanitarian crises) and future Rwandas (cases where states lack the political will to intervene). It suggests that four key factors contributed to the consensus: pressure from proponents of the International Commission on Intervention and State Sovereignty, its adoption by Kofi Annan and the UN's High Level Panel, an emerging consensus in the African Union, and the American position. Whilst these four factors contributed to consensus, each altered the meaning of the responsibility to protect in important ways, creating a doctrine that many states can sign up to but that does little to prevent future Kosovos and Rwandas and may actually inhibit attempts to build a consensus around intervention in future cases
|Keywords||United Nations Humanitarian intervention Human rights Consensus 360105 International Relations C1 750701 Understanding international relations|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Religion, Violence, and Human Rights.James Turner Johnson - 2013 - Journal of Religious Ethics 41 (1):1-14.
Humanitarian Intervention and International Law: The Moral Importance of an Intervener's Legal Status.James Pattison - 2007 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 10 (3):301-319.
Allies in Tension: Identifying and Bridging the Rift Between R2p and Just War.Henrik Friberg-Fernros - 2011 - Journal of Military Ethics 10 (3):160-173.
Similar books and articles
Motives, Outcomes, Intent and the Legitimacy of Humanitarian Intervention.Alex J. Bellamy - 2004 - Journal of Military Ethics 3 (3):216-232.
“Leading From Behind”: The Responsibility to Protect, the Obama Doctrine, and Humanitarian Intervention After Libya.Simon Chesterman - 2011 - Ethics and International Affairs 25 (3):279-285.
Legitimacy, Humanitarian Intervention, and International Institutions.M. Kahler - 2011 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 10 (1):20-45.
Humanitarian Intervention and International Relations.M. Welsh Jennifer (ed.) - 2003 - Oxford University Press.
Selective Humanitarian Intervention: Moral Reason and Collective Agents.Jennifer Szende - 2012 - Journal of Global Ethics 8 (1):63-76.
Whose Responsibility to Protect? The Duties of Humanitarian Intervention.James Pattison - 2008 - Journal of Military Ethics 7 (4):262-283.
From Humanitarian Intervention (HI) to Responsibility to Protect (R2P).Dorota Gierycz - 2010 - Criminal Justice Ethics 29 (2):110-128.
Humanitarian Intervention and the Responsibility to Protect: Who Should Intervene?James Pattison - 2010 - Oxford University Press.
Responsibility to Protect or Trojan Horse? The Crisis in Darfur and Humanitarian Intervention After Iraq.Alex J. Bellamy - 2005 - Ethics and International Affairs 19 (2):31–54.
Humanitarian Military Intervention: Wars for the End of History?Clifford Orwin - 2006 - Social Philosophy and Policy 23 (1):196-217.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads232 ( #14,456 of 2,146,977 )
Recent downloads (6 months)5 ( #162,483 of 2,146,977 )
How can I increase my downloads?
There are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.