A Just War Theory for a Four-Sided Armed Conflict

Washington University Review of Philosophy 2:188-208 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Contemporary just war theory usually addresses armed conflicts between two group agents, assuming that one is an aggressor and the other a defender. This paper discusses conflicts between two ethnonational groups, both of which include defenders and aggressors. The normative questions that this essay addresses are two: Are minimalists entitled to join their maximalist conationals in fighting the maximalists on the other side, and if so, in which circumstances? If so, what should minimalists have aimed to achieve by resorting to force and coercion?

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 99,362

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The legitimacy of occupation authority: beyond just war theory.Cord Schmelzle - 2020 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 23 (3):392-413.
Just War Theory and the Military Response to Terrorism.Isaac Taylor - 2017 - Social Theory and Practice 43 (4):717-740.
The Catholic Tradition on Vital Conflicts.Joshua Evans - 2017 - The National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly 17 (2):275-290.
A Just-war Critique of Realism and Pacifism.Brian Orend - 2001 - Journal of Philosophical Research 26:435-477.
Rethinking the Just War Tradition.Michael W. Brough, John W. Lango & Harry van der Linden (eds.) - 2007 - State University of New York Press.
Just War Theory: Revisionists Vs Traditionalists.Seth Lazar - 2017 - Annual Review of Political Science 20:37-54.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-09-24

Downloads
34 (#544,526)

6 months
8 (#447,211)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references