Characterisation and Interpretation: The Importance of Drama in Plato's Sophist

Literature & Aesthetics 6:27-39 (1996)

Abstract

Plato's Sophist is complex. Its themes are many and ambiguous. The early grammarians gave it the subtitle1tEp1. 'tau ov'to~ ('on being') and assigned it to Plato's logical investigations. The Neoplatonists prized it for a theory of ontological categories they preferred to Aristotle's. Modern scholars sometimes court paradox and refer to the Sophist as Plato's dialogue on not-being (because the question ofthe possibility of not-being occupies much of the dialogue). Whitehead took the Sophist to be primarily about ouvo.~t~ ('power') and found in it many of the central ideas of process theology.2 Heidegger thought it articulated the 'average concept of being in general'.3 In Cornford's view the Sophist is mainly about truth and falsehood. Ackrill, Frede and most analytic philosophers think it is about predication.4 Stanley Rosen treats it as a metaphysico-aesthetic dialogue: in his view it is about the relation of images to originals.5 As far as the title of the dialogue goes, however, opinion is almost universal. Do not be misled: 'the definition of the sophist' observed Archer-Hind 'is simply a piece of pungent satire'6 and he added that 'we may be sure that (Plato] cared little about defining the sophist, but very much about the metaphysical questions to which the process of definition was to give rise'.7 The most spectacular case of agreement with this judgment can be found in Cornford, who omits to translate the sections on the definition of the sophist because, as he says 'the modern reader ... might be wearied'.8

Download options

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 72,660

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-01-31

Downloads
6 (#1,141,205)

6 months
1 (#388,311)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Similar books and articles

Difference in Kind: Observations on the Distinction of the Megista Gene.David Ambuel - 2013 - In Beatriz Bossi & Thomas M. Robinson (eds.), Plato's Sophist Revisited. de Gruyter. pp. 247-268.
Plato's Sophist: The Drama of Original and Image. [REVIEW]Nicholas P. White - 1985 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 23 (3):419-422.
Plato, Sophist 244 C.J. Cook Wilson - 1913 - Classical Quarterly 7 (01):52-.
The Ambiguity Of 'Partaking' In Plato'S Sophist.James Kostman - 1989 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 27 (July):343-363.
Self-Predication in the Sophist.Robert Heinaman - 1981 - Phronesis 26 (1):55 - 66.

Author's Profile

Rick Benitez
University of Sydney

References found in this work

Plato: The Collected Dialogues.Edith Hamilton & Huntington Cairns (eds.) - 1961 - Princeton: New Jersey: Princeton University Press.

Add more references

Citations of this work

The Science of Philosophy: Discourse and Deception in Plato’s Sophist.Pettersson Olof - 2018 - Epoché: A Journal for the History of Philosophy 22 (2):221-237.

Add more citations