Consensual Discrimination

Philosophical Quarterly (forthcoming)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

What makes discrimination morally bad? In this paper, we discuss the putative badness of a case of consensual discrimination to show that prominent accounts of the badness of discrimination—appealing, inter alia, to harm, disrespect and inequality—fail to provide a satisfactory answer to this question. In view of this, we present a more promising account.

Other Versions

No versions found

Analytics

Added to PP
2024-03-29

Downloads
215 (#104,581)

6 months
139 (#39,550)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Lauritz Munch
Aarhus University
Andreas Bengtson
Aarhus University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Why be rational.Niko Kolodny - 2005 - Mind 114 (455):509-563.
Which Reasons? Which Rationality?Daniel Fogal & Alex Worsnip - 2021 - Ergo: An Open Access Journal of Philosophy 8.
Moral Risk and Communicating Consent.Renée Bolinger - 2019 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 47 (2):179-207.
Wide or narrow scope?John Broome - 2007 - Mind 116 (462):359-370.

View all 17 references / Add more references