Courtrooms As Disabling Remembering Positions

Social Philosophy Today 21:253-256 (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Many people, often students, appear apathetic because they do not know how to support human rights. In this paper, I explore a question that is part of a larger project helping people think through moral life in the age of human rights. What are appropriate contexts for invoking human rights? I begin with two assumptions: (1) Our sense of common humanity is the source of human rights. (2) There are situations where it seems we should disregard human rights out of common humanity. Reflecting on two examples, I argue there is a class of harms where one should disregard human rights because one intends to be humane. I call this class “harms that exceed right” (HER). I isolate two kinds of such harm: (1) harms against relationship and (2) harms against personhood. I conclude with a general point: human rights application should bear in mind an “adverbial consideration.” How we invoke human rights matters, and human rights should be invoked humanely

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 89,330

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-12-02

Downloads
48 (#288,318)

6 months
2 (#637,499)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Jeremy David Bendik-Keymer
Case Western Reserve University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references