Open Philosophy 1 (1):173-190 (2018)

Authors
Michael James Bennett
University of King's College
Abstract
Deleuze and Guattari’s manner of distinguishing science from philosophy in their last collaboration What is Philosophy? seems to imply a hierarchy, according to which philosophy is more adequate to the reality of virtual events than science is. This suggests, in turn, that philosophy has a better claim than science to truth. This paper clarifies Deleuze‘s views about truth throughout his career. Deleuze equivocates over the term, using it in an “originary” and a “derived” sense, probably under the influence of Henri Bergson, who does similarly. Moreover, William James and pragmatism were to Bergson what the early analytic philosophers Frege and Russell are to Deleuze: excessively scientistic foils whose confusions about truth arise as a result of failing to distinguish science from philosophy. By situating Deleuze’s conception of truth in relation to the early Heidegger’s, which it to some extent resembles, the paper concludes by suggesting that, surprisingly, neither kind of truth Deleuze licenses applies to science, while both apply to philosophy. Science is indifferent to truth in the way that some of Deleuze‘s readers have incorrectly wanted to say that he thinks philosophy is.
Keywords Deleuze  Heidegger  adequation  science  sense  truth
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1515/opphil-2018-0013
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 61,089
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Vagueness.Bertrand Russell - 1923 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 1 (2):84 – 92.
Vagueness.Bertrand Russell - 1923 - Australasian Journal of Psychology and Philosophy 1 (2):84-92.
On Vagueness.Bertrand Russell - 1923 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 1 (2):84.
The Use of Useless Knowledge: Bergson Against the Pragmatists.Barry Allen - 2013 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 43 (1):37-59.

View all 8 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Temporality and Truth.Daniel W. Smith - 2013 - Deleuze and Guatarri Studies 7 (3):377-389.
Deleuze's Rethinking of the Notion of Sense.Daniela Voss - 2013 - Deleuze and Guatarri Studies 7 (1):1-25.
Deleuze's Hume.Jeffrey Bell - 2008 - Hume Studies 35 (1/2):246-250.
Responsive Becoming: Ethics Between Deleuze and Feminism.Erinn Gilson - 2011 - In Nathan Jun & Daniel W. Smith (eds.), Deleuze and Ethics. Edinburgh University Press.
Nomadography: The ‘Early’ Deleuze and the History of Philosophy.Robert T. Tally Jr - 2010 - Journal of Philosophy: A Cross-Disciplinary Inquiry 5 (11):15-24.
Deleuze, Marx and the Politicisation of Philosophy.Simon Choat - 2009 - Deleuze and Guatarri Studies 3 (Suppl):8-27.
The Cambridge Companion to Deleuze.Daniel W. Smith & Henry Somers-Hall (eds.) - 2012 - Cambridge University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2018-09-22

Total views
22 ( #484,664 of 2,439,875 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #432,124 of 2,439,875 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes