Theory and Decision 45 (2):99-159 (1998)

Jonathan Bendor
Stanford University
To understand the meaning of evolutionary equilibria, it is necessary to comprehend the ramifications of the evolutionary model. For instance, a full appreciation of Axelrod's The Evolution of Cooperation requires that we identify assumptions under which conditionally cooperative strategies, like Tit For Tat, are and are not evolutionarily stable. And more generally, when does stability fail? To resolve these questions we re-examine the very foundations of the evolutionary model. The results of this paper can be analytically separated into three parts. The first part is conceptual: it identifies the evolutionary model's assumptions and shows how different assumptions imply different types of evolutionary stability. The second part is deductive: it establishes necessary and sufficient conditions for the types of evolutionary stability identified in the first part, and demonstrates in which games these kinds of stability can (and cannot) be attained. The third and final part is applied: it relates the general findings (which are independent of the specific payoffs of any particular evolutionary game) to the issue of the evolutionary stability of cooperation. Results on cooperation appear throughout the paper as they both exemplify and motivate the general results. These results essentially explain when cooperation is and is not stable, and why, thus shedding new light on the meaning and applicability of Axelrod's widely known claims
Keywords Evolutionary game theory  Evolutionarily stable strategies  Evolutionary equilibria  Evolution of cooperation  Iterated Prisoner's Dilemma (IPD)  Tit For Tat (TFT)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1023/A:1005083323183
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 70,307
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Rationality and Coordination.Cristina Bicchieri - 1996 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 47 (4):627-629.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Third Party Sanctions in Games with Communication.Jan Obłój & Katarzyna Abramczuk - 2017 - Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric 50 (1):109-138.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Evolutionary Synthesis: A Search for the Strategy.Juha Tuomi - 1992 - Philosophy of Science 59 (3):429-438.
Popper, Falsifiability, and Evolutionary Biology.David N. Stamos - 1996 - Biology and Philosophy 11 (2):161-191.
Probabilistic Equilibria for Evolutionarily Stable Strategies.Roger A. McCain - 2007 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 30 (1):34-36.
How a Kantian Can Accept Evolutionary Metaethics.Frederick Rauscher - 1997 - Biology and Philosophy 12 (3):303-326.
Behavioral Ethics Meets Natural Justice.Herbert Gintis - 2006 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 5 (1):5-32.
Evolutionary Psychology and the Massive Modularity Hypothesis.Richard Samuels - 1998 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 49 (4):575-602.


Added to PP index

Total views
39 ( #291,224 of 2,507,862 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #416,715 of 2,507,862 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes