Experiencing photographs qua photographs: what's so special about them?

Contemporary Aesthetics (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Merely rhetorically, and answering in the negative, Kendall Walton has asked: "Isn't photography just another method people have of making pictures, one that merely uses different tools and materials – cameras, photosensitive paper, darkroom equipment, rather than canvas, paint, and brushes? And don't the results differ only contingently and in degree, not fundamentally, from pictures of other kinds?" Contra Walton and others, I wish to defend in this article a resounding "Yes" as being the correct answer to these questions. It is a widely shared view that photographs are somehow special and that they fundamentally differ from hand-made pictures like paintings, both from a phenomenological point of view (in the way we experience them), and an epistemic point of view (since they are supposed to have a different – greater – epistemic value than paintings, giving us a privileged access to the world). In what follows, I shall reject almost the totality of these claims, and as a consequence there will remain little difference left between photographs and paintings. As we shall see, 'photographs are always partly paintings' – a claim that is true not only of retouched digital photographs but of all photographs, including traditional ones made using photosensitive film and development techniques.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Three kinds of realism about photographs.Jiri Benovsky - 2011 - Journal of Speculative Philosophy 25 (4):375-395.
Photography and Ontology.Joel Snyder - 1983 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 19 (1):21-34.
On the epistemic value of photographs.Jonathan Cohen & Aaron Meskin - 2004 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 62 (2):197–210.
Can Digital Pictures Qualify As Photographs?Geert Gooskens - 2012 - American Society for Aesthetics Graduate E-Journal 4 (1):17-23.
On Seeing Walton's Great-Grandfather.Edwin Martin - 1986 - Critical Inquiry 12 (4):796-800.
Depiction and Imagination.Jiri Benovsky - 2016 - SATS 17 (1):61-80.
The Epistemic Value of Photographs.Catharine Abell - 2010 - In Catharine Abell & Katerina Bantinaki (eds.), Philosophical Perspectives on Depiction. Oxford University Press.
Depiction and imagination.Jiri Benovsky - 2016 - SATS 17 (1):61-80.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-06-04

Downloads
349 (#60,999)

6 months
58 (#85,994)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Jiri Benovsky
University of Fribourg

Citations of this work

Aesthetic appreciation of landscapes.Jiri Benovsky - 2016 - Journal of Value Inquiry 50 (2):325-340.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Material beings.Peter Van Inwagen - 1990 - Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Material Beings.Peter Van Inwagen - 1990 - Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.
Objects and Persons.Trenton Merricks - 2001 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Material Beings.Peter van Inwagen - 1993 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 53 (3):701-708.
Précis of Objects and Persons.Trenton Merricks - 2003 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 67 (3):700-703.

View all 16 references / Add more references