Fair Numbers: What Data Can and Cannot Tell Us About the Underrepresentation of Women in Philosophy


Authors
Yann Benétreau-Dupin
San Francisco State University
Guillaume Beaulac
Carleton University
Abstract
The low representation (< 30%) of women in philosophy in English-speaking countries has generated much discussion, both in academic circles and the public sphere. It is sometimes suggested (Haslanger 2009) that unconscious biases, acting at every level in the field, may be grounded in gendered schemas of philosophers and in the discipline more widely, and that actions to make philosophy a more welcoming place for women should address such schemas. However, existing data are too limited to fully warrant such an explanation, which therefore will not satisfy those in favor of the status quo or those who argue against the need to address gender imbalance. In this paper, we propose measures to improve the profession that ought to be implemented without referring explicitly to this underrepresentation or to the climate for women and other underrepresented groups. Such recommendations are based on empirical research already carried out in other disciplines and do not rest on whether it is possible to identify the cause of this low representation. We argue that we need not wait for new or better data to ensure that fairer practices are enacted for women, other underrepresented groups, and everybody else, if only out of precaution.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.3998/ergo.12405314.0002.003
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Implicit Bias and the Idealized Rational Self.Nora Berenstain - 2018 - Ergo: An Open Access Journal of Philosophy 5:445-485.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Sex, Gender, and Difference.Victoria K. Burbank - 1992 - Human Nature 3 (3):251-277.
Farm Women in Slovenia: Endeavors for Equality. [REVIEW]Ana Barbic - 1993 - Agriculture and Human Values 10 (4):13-25.
Gender Issues in Health Care.P. M. McCarrick - 1995 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 5 (1):61-80.
Gender and Philosophical Intuition.Wesley Buckwalter & Stephen Stich - 2013 - In Joshua Knobe & Shaun Nichols (eds.), Experimental Philosophy, Vol.2. Oxford University Press. pp. 307-346.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2014-10-06

Total views
472 ( #9,603 of 2,266,097 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
96 ( #5,625 of 2,266,097 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature