Feature see, feature do

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (1):18-19 (1998)
  Copy   BIBTEX


Physiological evidence predicts a model of concept categorisation that evolves through direct interaction with object feature selection. The requirement stated by Schyns et al. for feature plasticity is supported, but important caveats raise a question about the level at which feature identification can occur. Visual attribute selection for feature creation is likely to be directed by top-down and attentional processes.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,873

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

A rational reconstruction of the domain of feature structures.M. Andrew Moshier - 1995 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 4 (2):111-143.
New features for old: Creation or derivation?Cyril R. Latimer - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (1):31-32.
New-feature learning: How common is it?Robert M. French & Mark Weaver - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (1):26-26.
Who needs created features?Katja Wiemer-Hastings & Arthur C. Graesser - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (1):39-39.
Even feature integration is cognitively impenetrable.Dale J. Cohen & Michael Kubovy - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (3):371-372.
Flexible feature creation: Child's play?Gedeon Deák - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (1):23-23.


Added to PP

63 (#261,880)

6 months
4 (#854,689)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references