Feature see, feature do

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (1):18-19 (1998)

Abstract
Physiological evidence predicts a model of concept categorisation that evolves through direct interaction with object feature selection. The requirement stated by Schyns et al. for feature plasticity is supported, but important caveats raise a question about the level at which feature identification can occur. Visual attribute selection for feature creation is likely to be directed by top-down and attentional processes.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/s0140525x98250102
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 45,727
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

A Rational Reconstruction of the Domain of Feature Structures.M. Andrew Moshier - 1995 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 4 (2):111-143.
New Features for Old: Creation or Derivation?Cyril R. Latimer - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (1):31-32.
New-Feature Learning: How Common is It?Robert M. French & Mark Weaver - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (1):26-26.
Who Needs Created Features?Katja Wiemer-Hastings & Arthur C. Graesser - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (1):39-39.
Even Feature Integration is Cognitively Impenetrable.Dale J. Cohen & Michael Kubovy - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (3):371-372.
Flexible Feature Creation: Child's Play?Gedeon Deák - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (1):23-23.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
51 ( #171,712 of 2,281,027 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
9 ( #106,723 of 2,281,027 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature