God and Matter in Locke: An Exposition of Essay 4.10

In Mercer & O'Neill (ed.), Early Modern Philosophy: Mind Matter Metaphysics. Oxford University Press (2005)
Although we never made time to talk it out thoroughly, Margaret Wilson and I shared an interest in, and enthusiasm for, the tenth chapter in Locke’s Essay IV, entitled ‘Of Our Knowledge of the Existence of a GOD.’ In the present paper, written in sad tribute to her work and her person, I shall expound that deep, subtle, intricate, flawed chapter. While I shall evaluate its arguments as I go, I chiefly aim just to make clear what happens in those nineteen sections, which I shall refer to by their numbers alone. They aim to show that ‘we are capable of knowing . . . that there is a GOD’ by cogently inferring this from secure premises. A god is any being that is ‘eternal, most powerful, and most knowing;’ given such a being, Locke adds laconically, ‘it matters not’ whether we call it God. This line of argument will be my topic in sections B through E. Two subsidiary themes in the chapter concern matter. One is this: given that there is a god, is it (or he) material or immaterial? Although he argues at length for God’s immateriality, Locke remarks in 13 that this in itself is of little moment. Someone with an otherwise correct theology is in good shape even if he wrongly thinks God to be made of matter - except, Locke adds, for a risk that he runs. Philosophers who are ‘devoted to matter,’ if they think God to be material, will comfortably conclude that everything is matter and will then ‘let slide out of their minds’ their theology, i.e. their view that the material world includes ‘an eternal, omniscient, omnipotent being.’ Section 13 also argues that if the materialists do thus drift into atheism, ‘they destroy their own [materialist] hypothesis.’ This is too clever by half; it is neither well done nor instructive, and I shall not expound it. Some of the Chapter’s richest treasures concern God’s immateriality..
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 38,113
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Dividing Locke From God.J. W. Tate - 2013 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 39 (2):133-164.
Divine Unsurpassability.Klaas J. Kraay - 2007 - Philosophia 35 (3-4):293-300.
Locke and French Materialism.John W. Yolton - 1991 - Oxford University Press.
Spinoza and Prime Matter.Charles Huenemann - 2004 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 42 (1):21-32.
How Matter Might First Be Made.Jonathan Bennett & Peter Remnant - 1978 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy, Supplementary Volume 4:1.
Locke's Relations and God's Good Pleasure.Rae Langton - 2000 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 100 (1):75–91.
The Reference of “God”.Richard B. Miller - 1986 - Faith and Philosophy 3 (1):3-15.
Malebranche on Disinterestedness.Sr Mary Bernard Curran - 2009 - Philosophy and Theology 21 (1/2):27-41.
Thoughts About God.Brian Davies - 2005 - Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 79:21-27.
Kierkegaard’s Conception of God.Paul K. Moser & Mark L. McCreary - 2010 - Philosophy Compass 5 (2):127-135.


Added to PP index

Total views
59 ( #116,827 of 2,313,625 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
7 ( #114,864 of 2,313,625 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature