Generalizing on Best Practices in Image Processing: A Model for Promoting Research Integrity
Science and Engineering Ethics 16 (4):669-673 (2010)
| Abstract |
Modifying images for scientific publication is now quick and easy due to changes in technology. This has created a need for new image processing guidelines and attitudes, such as those offered to the research community by Doug Cromey (Cromey 2010). We suggest that related changes in technology have simplified the task of detecting misconduct for journal editors as well as researchers, and that this simplification has caused a shift in the responsibility for reporting misconduct. We also argue that the concept of best practices in image processing can serve as a general model for education in best practices in research
|
| Keywords | Misconduct Image processing RCR Best practices Ethical thinking Ethics in science |
| Categories | (categorize this paper) |
| DOI | 10.1007/s11948-010-9226-2 |
| Options |
Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
|
Download options
References found in this work BETA
Avoiding Twisted Pixels: Ethical Guidelines for the Appropriate Use and Manipulation of Scientific Digital Images.Douglas Cromey - 2010 - Science and Engineering Ethics 16 (4):639-667.
Image Manipulation as Research Misconduct.Debra Parrish & Bridget Noonan - 2009 - Science and Engineering Ethics 15 (2):161-167.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articlesImage Manipulation as Research Misconduct.Debra Parrish & Bridget Noonan - 2009 - Science and Engineering Ethics 15 (2):161-167.
Confronting Misconduct in Science in the 1980s and 1990s: What has and has Not Been Accomplished?Nicholas H. Steneck - 1999 - Science and Engineering Ethics 5 (2):161-176.
Scientific Societies and Research Integrity: What Are They Doing and How Well Are They Doing It?Margot Iverson, Mark S. Frankel & Sanyin Siang - 2003 - Science and Engineering Ethics 9 (2):141-158.
An Introduction to Research Ethics.Paul J. Friedman - 1996 - Science and Engineering Ethics 2 (4):443-456.
Teaching Authorship and Publication Practices in the Biomedical and Life Sciences.Francis Macrina - 2011 - Science and Engineering Ethics 17 (2):341-354.
The Role of Scientific Associations in Promoting Research Integrity and Deterring Research Misconduct.Melissa S. Anderson & Joseph B. Shultz - 2003 - Science and Engineering Ethics 9 (2):269-272.
Effectiveness of Research Guidelines in Prevention of Scientific Misconduct.Eleanor G. Shore - 1995 - Science and Engineering Ethics 1 (4):383-387.
MentOring and Research Misconduct: An Analysis of Research mentOring in Closed Ori Cases.E. Wright David, L. Titus Sandra & B. Cornelison Jered - 2008 - Science and Engineering Ethics 14 (3):323-336.
Pause of Participation. On the Function of Artificial Presence.Lambert Wiesing - 2011 - Research in Phenomenology 41 (2):238-252.
Research Integrity in Greater China: Surveying Regulations, Perceptions and Knowledge of Research Integrity From a Hong Kong Perspective.Sara R. Jordan & Phillip W. Gray - 2013 - Developing World Bioethics 13 (3):125-137.
Variations and Application Conditions of the Data Type »Image« - the Foundation of Computational Visualistics.Dr Jörg R. J. Schirra - manuscript
To Do Well by Doing Good: Improving Corporate Image Through Cause-Related Marketing.Joëlle Vanhamme, Adam Lindgreen, Jon Reast & Nathalie Popering - 2012 - Journal of Business Ethics 109 (3):259-274.
Roles for Scientific Societies in Promoting Integrity in Publication Ethics.Addeane S. Caelleigh - 2003 - Science and Engineering Ethics 9 (2):221-241.
Monthly downloads
Added to index
2010-11-18Total downloads
20 ( #250,303 of 2,178,217 )Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #316,497 of 2,178,217 )How can I increase my downloads?
My notes
Discussion
Nothing in this forum yet.
