Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 83 (2):345-365 (2011)
I develop a Russellian representationalist account of size experience that draws importantly from contemporary vision science research on size perception. The core view is that size is experienced in ‘body-scaled’ units. So, an object might, say, be experienced as two eye-level units high. The view is sharpened in response to Thompson’s (forthcoming) Doubled Earth example. This example is presented by Thompson as part of an argument for a Fregean view of size experience. But I argue that the Russellian view I develop handles the Doubled Earth example in a natural and illuminating way, thereby avoiding the need to posit irreducible experiential ‘modes of presentation’. I also address a kind of neo-Fregean ‘reference-fixing’ view of size experience, that shares features with the Russellian view developed. I give reasons for favoring the latter. Finally, I argue that Peacocke’s claim that spatial experience is ‘unit free’ is not persuasive
|Keywords||Analytic Philosophy Contemporary Philosophy Philosophy of Mind|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
Citations of this work BETA
Spatial Attention and Perception: Seeing Without Paint.A. Tanesini - 2015 - Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 14 (3):433-454.
Similar books and articles
Perception of Size.Aage Slomann - 1968 - Inquiry : An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 11 (1-4):101 – 113.
Critical Reasoning and Science : Looking at Science with an Investigative Eye.Mark Holowchak - 2007 - University Press of America.
Environmental Ethics and Size.Charles S. Cockell - 2008 - Ethics and the Environment 13 (1):pp. 23-39.
Neurological Models of Size Scaling.Helen E. Ross - 2003 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (4):425-425.
Colour Constancy and Fregean Representationalism.Boyd Millar - 2013 - Philosophical Studies 164 (1):219-231.
When the Coefficient Hits the Clinic: Effect Size and the Size of the Effect.Brendan Maher - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (2):211-211.
To Normalize or Not to Normalize for Overall Size?Francisco Aboitiz - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (3):327-328.
Worldly Indeterminacy: A Rough Guide.Nicholas J. J. Smith & Gideon Rosen - 2004 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 82 (1):185 – 198.
Lower Bounds to the Size of Constant-Depth Propositional Proofs.Jan Krajiček - 1994 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 59 (1):73-86.
What is the Subjectivity of Perceptual Experience?Bosuk Yoon - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 42:215-222.
Added to index2011-01-12
Total downloads126 ( #38,806 of 2,177,988 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #166,811 of 2,177,988 )
How can I increase my downloads?