Matters of Interest: The Objects of Research in Science and Technoscience [Book Review]

Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 42 (2):365-383 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This discussion paper proposes that a meaningful distinction between science and technoscience can be found at the level of the objects of research. Both notions intermingle in the attitudes, intentions, programs and projects of researchers and research institutions—that is, on the side of the subjects of research. But the difference between science and technoscience becomes more explicit when research results are presented in particular settings and when the objects of research are exhibited for the specific interest they hold. When an experiment is presented as scientific evidence which confirms or disconfirms a hypothesis, this agrees with traditional conceptions of science. When organic molecules are presented for their capacity to serve individually as electric wires that carry surprisingly large currents, this would be a hallmark of technoscience. Accordingly, we propose research on the ontology of research objects. The focus on the character and significance of research objects makes this a specifically philosophical project

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,642

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Toward a Philosophy of Technosciences.Sacha Loeve & Bernadette Bensaude Vincent - 2018 - In Bernadette Bensaude Vincent, Xavier Guchet & Sacha Loeve (eds.), French Philosophy of Technology: Classical Readings and Contemporary Approaches. Cham: Springer Verlag. pp. 169-186.
Toward a philosophy of technosciences.Bernadette Bensaude Vincent & Sacha Loeve - 2018 - In Bernadette Bensaude Vincent, Xavier Guchet & Sacha Loeve (eds.), French Philosophy of Technology: Classical Readings and Contemporary Approaches. Cham: Springer Verlag. pp. 169-186.
Technoscience, Biopolitics and Biobanking.Stanislav M. Gavrilenko - 2020 - Epistemology and Philosophy of Science 57 (1):38-44.
Technoscience and Prospects for Improving Human.Elena Bryzgalina - 2016 - Epistemology and Philosophy of Science 48 (2):28-33.
Technoscience and Prospects for Improving Human.Е.В Брызгалина - 2016 - Epistemology and Philosophy of Science 48 (2):28-33.
Reflections on science and technoscience.Hugh Lacey - 2012 - Scientiae Studia 10 (SPE):103-128.
Knowledge Objects of Synthetic Biology: From Phase Transitions to the Biological Switch.Thorsten Kohl & Johannes Falk - 2020 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 51 (1):1-17.
Technoscience: “Where the Danger Is, Grows the Saving Power Also”.Lada V. Shipovalova - 2020 - Epistemology and Philosophy of Science 57 (1):45-50.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-10-30

Downloads
17 (#213,731)

6 months
257 (#80,724)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

References found in this work

From a Logical Point of View.Willard Van Orman Quine - 1953 - Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Tractatus logico-philosophicus.Ludwig Wittgenstein, G. C. M. Colombo & Bertrand Russell - 1921 - New York,: Humanities Press. Edited by C. K. Ogden.
Tractatus logico-philosophicus.Ludwig Wittgenstein - 1922 - Filosoficky Casopis 52:336-341.

View all 69 references / Add more references