Not “Not ‘Better Never to Have Been’”: A Reply to Christine Overall

Philosophia 47 (2):353-367 (2019)

David Benatar
University of Cape Town
In her Why Have Children?, Christine Overall takes issue with my anti-natalist arguments that it is better never to come into existence. She provides three criticisms of my arguments and then, in a fourth criticism, suggests that my conclusions are bad for women. I respond to her criticisms, arguing that they fail.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11406-018-9972-y
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 46,179
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Overall and Aquinas on Miracles.David K. Kovacs - 2016 - Dialogue 55 (1):151-160.
Christine Korsgaards moralfilosofi.Gunnar Björnsson - 2005 - Norsk Filosofisk Tidsskrift 1:38–54.
Reply to Shrage.Christine Overall - 1994 - Signs 19 (2):571-575.
Miracles, Evidence, and God.Robert Larmer - 2003 - Dialogue 42 (1):107-.
Every Conceivable Harm: A Further Defence of Anti-Natalism.D. Benatar - 2012 - South African Journal of Philosophy 31 (1):128-164.
Reply to Baier.Christine Swanton - 2010 - In Charles R. Pigden (ed.), Hume on Motivation and Virtue. Palgrave-Macmillan. pp. 259.


Added to PP index

Total views
115 ( #73,386 of 2,285,603 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
22 ( #39,397 of 2,285,603 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes

Sign in to use this feature