Journal of Social Philosophy 35 (4):544–549 (2004)
In her book _Inclusion and Democracy_, Iris Marion Young offers a defense of a certain model of deliberative democracy and argues that political institutions that conform to this model are just. I argue that Young gives two contradictory accounts of why such institutions are just, and I weigh the relative merits of two ways in which this contradiction can be resolved.
|Keywords||procedural justice deliberative democracy Iris Marion Young|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Does Public Ignorance Defeat Deliberative Democracy?Robert B. Talisse - 2004 - Critical Review 16 (4):455-463.
The Value Theory of Democracy.Corey Brettschneider - 2006 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 5 (3):259-278.
Cultural Claims and the Limits of Liberal Democracy.Ranjoo Seodu Herr - 2008 - Social Theory and Practice 34 (1):25-48.
Rethinking Deliberative Democracy: From Deliberative Discourse to Transformative Dialogue.P. Healy - 2011 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 37 (3):295-311.
Deliberativist Responses to Activist Challenges: A Continuation of Young’s Dialectic.Robert B. Talisse - 2005 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 31 (4):423-444.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads17 ( #271,676 of 2,132,862 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #388,508 of 2,132,862 )
How can I increase my downloads?
There are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.