Artificial Intelligence and Law 10 (1-3):79-94 (2002)
Abstract |
In this paper I recapitulate the ideas of Berman and Hafner (1993) regarding the role of teleology in legal argument. I show how these ideas can be used to address some issues arising from more recent work on legal argument, and how this relates to ideas associated with the New Rhetoric of Perelman. I illustrate the points with a discussion of the classic problem of which vehicles should be allowed in parks
|
Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
ISBN(s) | |
DOI | 10.1023/A:1019501830692 |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
The New Rhetoric: A Treatise on Argumentation.Chaïm Perelman & Lucie Olbrechts-Tyteca - 1969 - Notre Dame, IN, USA: Notre Dame University Press.
The New Rhetoric: A Treatise on Argumentation.Chaïm Perelman - 1969 - Notre Dame, [Ind.]University of Notre Dame Press.
The New Rhetoric: A Treatise on Argumentation.Ch Perelman, L. Olbrechts-Tyteca, John Wilkinson & Purcell Weaver - 1969 - Philosophy and Rhetoric 3 (4):249-254.
Justice, Law, and Argument: Essays on Moral and Legal Reasoning.Ch Perelman - 1980 - Dordrecht and Boston: Reidel.
View all 9 references / Add more references
Citations of this work BETA
Reasoning with dimensions and magnitudes.John Horty - 2019 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 27 (3):309-345.
HYPO's Legacy: Introduction to the Virtual Special Issue.T. J. M. Bench-Capon - 2017 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 25 (2):205-250.
A History of AI and Law in 50 Papers: 25 Years of the International Conference on AI and Law. [REVIEW]Trevor Bench-Capon, Michał Araszkiewicz, Kevin Ashley, Katie Atkinson, Floris Bex, Filipe Borges, Daniele Bourcier, Paul Bourgine, Jack G. Conrad, Enrico Francesconi, Thomas F. Gordon, Guido Governatori, Jochen L. Leidner, David D. Lewis, Ronald P. Loui, L. Thorne McCarty, Henry Prakken, Frank Schilder, Erich Schweighofer, Paul Thompson, Alex Tyrrell, Bart Verheij, Douglas N. Walton & Adam Z. Wyner - 2012 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 20 (3):215-319.
Representing Dimensions Within the Reason Model of Precedent.Adam Rigoni - 2018 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 26 (1):1-22.
An Exercise in Formalising Teleological Case-Based Reasoning.Henry Prakken - 2002 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 10 (1-3):113-133.
View all 18 citations / Add more citations
Similar books and articles
Was Inclusive Legal Positivism Founded on a Mistake?Scott J. Shapiro - 2009 - Ratio Juris 22 (3):326-338.
Argument in Artificial Intelligence and Law.Trevor Bench-Capon - 1997 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 5 (4):249-261.
Evolution: Teleology or Chance? [REVIEW]F. J. K. Soontiëns - 1991 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 22 (1):133-141.
Are Deontology and Teleology Mutually Exclusive?James E. Macdonald & Caryn L. Beck-Dudley - 1994 - Journal of Business Ethics 13 (8):615 - 623.
Legal Reasoning and Legal Theory Revisited.Fernando Atria - 1999 - Law and Philosophy 18 (5):537-577.
Arguments and Cases: An Inevitable Intertwining. [REVIEW]David B. Skalak & Edwina L. Rissland - 1992 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 1 (1):3-44.
Legal Logic? Or Can We Do Without?Arend Soeteman - 2003 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 11 (2-3):197-210.
Missing a Piece : Legal Postivism and the Problem of Legal Obligation.K. E. Himma - 2007 - In Josep J. Moreso (ed.), Legal Theory: Legal Positivism and Conceptual Analysis: Proceedings of the 22nd Ivr World Congress, Granada 2005, Volume I = Teoría Del Derecho: Positivismo Jurídico y Análisis Conceptual. Franz Steiner Verlag.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2009-01-28
Total views
48 ( #236,079 of 2,507,427 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #416,983 of 2,507,427 )
2009-01-28
Total views
48 ( #236,079 of 2,507,427 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #416,983 of 2,507,427 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads