Metaphilosophy 42 (5):605-616 (2011)

David Benatar
University of Cape Town
Sami Pihlström argues in his “Ethical Unthinkabilities and Philosophical Seriousness” that there are some philosophical views that are so dangerous that we should not discuss them. He advances this argument with special reference to my (anti-natalist) view that being brought into existence is always a serious harm. In response I argue: (a) that there are major flaws in his argument for the conclusion that we should not think about (purportedly) unthinkable views; and (b) that my views about the harm of coming into existence are in any event neither unthinkable nor dangerous
Keywords anti‐natalism  dangerous views  philosophical seriousness  quality of life  unthinkable ideas
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/j.1467-9973.2011.01712.x
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 69,043
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Pragmatism and the Ethical Grounds of Metaphysics.Sami Pihlström - 2008 - Philosophical Topics 36 (1):211-237.
On the Concept of Philosophical Anthropology.Sami Pihlström - 2003 - Journal of Philosophical Research 28:259-286.


Added to PP index

Total views
92 ( #125,270 of 2,498,558 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
4 ( #171,114 of 2,498,558 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes