Weirdness is in the eye of the beholder

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 33 (2-3):85-86 (2010)
Abstract
Henrich et al.'s critical review demonstrating that psychology research is over-reliant on WEIRD samples is an important contribution to the field. Their stronger claim that is less convincing, however. We argue that WEIRD people's apparent distinct weirdness is a methodological side-effect of psychology's over-reliance on WEIRD populations for developing its methods and theoretical constructs
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/S0140525X1000004X
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 34,515
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Equipoise May Be in the Eye of the Beholder.Anne Moyer & Anna H. L. Floyd - 2009 - American Journal of Bioethics 9 (2):21 – 22.
Culture: In the Beak of the Beholder?Spencer K. Lynn & Irene M. Pepperberg - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (2):341-342.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2013-10-27

Total downloads
8 ( #573,111 of 2,268,176 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #373,236 of 2,268,176 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature