Weirdness is in the eye of the beholder

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 33 (2-3):85-86 (2010)
Abstract
Henrich et al.'s critical review demonstrating that psychology research is over-reliant on WEIRD samples is an important contribution to the field. Their stronger claim that is less convincing, however. We argue that WEIRD people's apparent distinct weirdness is a methodological side-effect of psychology's over-reliance on WEIRD populations for developing its methods and theoretical constructs
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/S0140525X1000004X
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 31,836
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Equipoise May Be in the Eye of the Beholder.Anne Moyer & Anna H. L. Floyd - 2009 - American Journal of Bioethics 9 (2):21 – 22.
Culture: In the Beak of the Beholder?Spencer K. Lynn & Irene M. Pepperberg - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (2):341-342.
Added to PP index
2013-10-27

Total downloads
7 ( #588,602 of 2,231,661 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #446,025 of 2,231,661 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature