What numbers could not be

Philosophical Review 74 (1):47-73 (1965)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 74,429

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Why the Numbers Should Sometimes Count.John T. Sanders - 1988 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 17 (1):3-14.
What Are Numbers?Zvonimir Šikić - 1996 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 10 (2):159-171.
A Conversation About Numbers and Knowledge.Charles Sayward - 2002 - American Philosophical Quarterly 39 (3):275-287.
On Infinite Number and Distance.Jeremy Gwiazda - 2012 - Constructivist Foundations 7 (2):126-130.
Recantation or Any Old W-Sequence Would Do After All.Paul Benacerraf - 1996 - Philosophia Mathematica 4 (2):184-189.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
1,751 (#3,005)

6 months
21 (#48,535)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

General Semantics.David K. Lewis - 1970 - Synthese 22 (1-2):18--67.
What is Structural Realism?James Ladyman - 1998 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 29 (3):409-424.
Quantifying In.David Kaplan - 1968 - Synthese 19 (1-2):178-214.
Inference to the Best Explanation.Peter Lipton - 2004 - In Martin Curd & Stathis Psillos (eds.), The Routledge Companion to Philosophy of Science. Routledge. pp. 193.

View all 490 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references