What numbers could not be

Philosophical Review 74 (1):47-73 (1965)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 97,197

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

What Numbers Could Not Be.Emily Katz - 2021 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 59 (2):193-219.
What numbers could be (and, hence, necessarily are).Mark Eli Kalderon - 1996 - Philosophia Mathematica 4 (3):238-255.
Structure and the Concept of Number.Mark Eli Kalderon - 1995 - Dissertation, Princeton University
Numerical Foundations.Jean W. Rioux - 2012 - Review of Metaphysics 66 (1):3-29.
Reducing Arithmetic to Set Theory.A. C. Paseau - 2009 - In Ø. Linnebo O. Bueno (ed.), New Waves in Philosophy of Mathematics. Palgrave-Macmillan. pp. 35-55.
On what could have happened.Morton White - 1968 - Philosophical Review 77 (1):73-89.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
2,019 (#5,293)

6 months
88 (#77,712)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

General semantics.David K. Lewis - 1970 - Synthese 22 (1-2):18--67.
What is structural realism?James Ladyman - 1998 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 29 (3):409-424.
Quantifying in.David Kaplan - 1968 - Synthese 19 (1-2):178-214.
Inference to the Best explanation.Peter Lipton - 2005 - In Martin Curd & Stathis Psillos (eds.), The Routledge Companion to Philosophy of Science. New York: Routledge. pp. 193.

View all 524 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references