What Relational Egalitarians Should (Not) Believe

Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy 27 (2) (2024)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Relational egalitarianism is a theory of justice according to which justice requires that people relate as equals. According to some relational egalitarians, X and Y relate as equals if, and only if, they (1) regard each other as equals; and (2) treat each other as equals. In this paper, we argue that relational egalitarians must give up 1.

Other Versions

No versions found

Similar books and articles

Doxastic Affirmative Action.Andreas Bengtson & Lauritz Aastrup Munch - 2024 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 27 (2):203-220.
Relational Justice: Egalitarian and Sufficientarian.Andreas Bengtson & Lasse Nielsen - 2023 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 40 (5):900-918.
Animals and Relational Egalitarianism(s).Andreas Bengtson - 2022 - Journal of Applied Philosophy (1):79-94.
Relational Egalitarianism, Institutionalism, and Workplace Hierarchy.Brian Berkey - 2023 - In Julian David Jonker & Grant J. Rozeboom (eds.), Working as Equals: Relational Egalitarianism and the Workplace. New York, US: Oxford University Press USA. pp. 194-213.
Why Be a Relational Egalitarian?Xuanpu Zhuang - 2024 - Philosophical Forum 55 (1):3-26.
Republicanism and/or Relational Egalitarianism?Andreas Bengtson - 2022 - Social Theory and Practice 48 (4):629-645.
Relational egalitarianism.Rekha Nath - 2020 - Philosophy Compass 15 (7):1-12.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-08-02

Downloads
621 (#34,904)

6 months
262 (#9,810)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Lauritz Munch
Aarhus University
Andreas Bengtson
Aarhus University

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references